Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 30;13:1179554918825447. doi: 10.1177/1179554918825447

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of different prognostic factors in patients treated with regorafenib.

Item PFS (mo)
(95% CI)
P-value OS (mo)
(95% CI)
P-value
Age, y
 ⩽65 2.8
(2.5-3.3)
.599 7.9
(6.0-9.7)
.628
 >65 2.95
(0.4-NR)
8.1
(3.2-NR)
Gender
 Male 3.0
(2.5-3.8)
.139 8.0
(6.0-13.1)
.986
 Female 2.6
(2.3-3.0)
7.9
(5.3-12.8)
ECOG PS
 1 3.3 (2.6-4.6) .0002 8.6 (6.7-14) .010
 >1 2.3 (1.7-3.0) 5.4 (4.2-7.9)
Interval from metastasis to regorafenib
 ⩽12 mo 3.8 (1.7-NR) .394 6.6 (2.9-NR) .537
 >12 mo 2.7 (2.5-3.1) 8.1 (6-12)
Sidedness of primary tumor
 Right 2.9 (2.3-3.3) .764 9.3 (5.1-14.4) .860
 Left 2.8 (2.4-3.6) 8.0 (6.0-11.4)
Number of organs involved
 1 2.4 (2.0-2.9) .081 9.3 (5.1-15.2) .633
 >1 3.0 (2.5-3.7) 7.9 (5.8-11.4)
Liver metastasis
 Yes 2.8 (2.5-3.3) .328 7.9 (5.8-9.3) .442
 No 2.6 (1.8-4.6) 12.8 (5.1-15.2)
KRAS gene mutation
 Wild 2.9 (2.1-3.8) .995 8.1 (5.4-17.3) .311
 Mutant 2.8 (2.5-3.3) 6.4 (5.3-9.7)
Prior bevacizumab
 Yes 2.8 (2.5-3.3) .972 8 (6.0-9.7) .658
 No 2.8 (2.0-5.3) 6.6 (3.2-NR)
Prior cetuximab
 Yes 2.9 (2.0-7.4) .280 8.1 (5.4-15.2) .973
 No 2.8 (2.5-3.3) 8.0 (5.8-12.8)
Regorafenib starting dose
 160 mg 2.3 (2.1-3.3) .547 12.8 (5.1-18.1) .149
 <160 mg 3.0 (2.6-3.7) 6.6 (5.4-8.6)
Dose reduction
 Yes 3.0 (2.6-3.8) .0012 8.0 (6.2-11.4) .573
 No 2.2 (2.0-2.5) 6.0 (4.1-13.1)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.