Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 1;14(1):112–126. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.4769

Table 1a.

Characteristics of studies with a follow-up period of minimum 12 months

Publication Study setting Level of evidence n (patients) n (ears) Age (years) (mean) [range] Follow-up (months) [range] Dilation instrument; inflation pressure and time
Silvola et al., 2014 [8] Prospective case series 4 37 (36 at the end of the follow-up) 42 (41 at the end of the follow-up) 48 [15–38] Mean 30, [18–50] Acclarent Relieva Solo 7×16 mm; 15 cases 12 bar, 1 min, 26 cases 12 bar 1 minx2
Schröder et al., 2015 [10] Retrospective case series 4 622 Total 1076 2 months: 506 of 1029
1 year: 188 of 671
2 years: 34 of 344
3 years: 11 of 119
4 years: 2 of 17
No mean reported [7–84] [2–48] Spiggle & Theis 3.3×20 mm; 10 bar, 2 min
Dalchow et al., 2016 [9] Prospective case series 4 Total 217
1 month: 175
3 months: 92
6 months: 43
9 months: 29
12 months: 19
342 Median 46 [6–88] [1–12] Spiggle & Theis 3.3×20 mm; 10 bar, 2 min
Xiong et al., 2016 [11] Retrospective case series 4 40 58 42 [21–70] 12 Spiggle & Theis 3.3×20 mm; 10 bar, 2 min
Leichtle et al., 2017 [2] Retrospective case series 4 Total 52
2 weeks: 41
2 months: 38
6 months: 27
12 months: 14
97 7 [3–15] [0–12] Spiggle & Theis, 3.2×20 mm; 8 bar, 2 min