Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 7;29(4):857–871. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy052

Table 2.

Level of evidence and grade of recommendation adapted from the Infectious Diseases Society of America–United States Public Health Service Grading System

I Evidence from at least one large randomized control trial of good methodologic quality (low potential for bias) or meta-analyses of wellconducted randomized trials without heterogeneity
II Small randomized trials or large randomized trials with a suspicion of bias (lower methodologic quality) or meta-analyses of such trials or of trials with demonstrated heterogeneity
III Prospective cohort studies
IV Retrospective cohort studies or case–control studies
V Studies without control group, case reports, experts opinions
A Strong evidence for efficacy with a substantial clinical benefit, strongly recommended
B Strong or moderate evidence for efficacy but with a limited clinical benefit, generally recommended
C Insufficient evidence for efficacy or benefit does not outweigh the risk or the disadvantages (adverse events, costs,), optional
D Moderate evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, generally not recommended
E Strong evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, never recommended