Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec;18(4):1255–1266. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i4.47

Supporting file 2.

Quality assessment score of the studies included in the analysis (n=15)

Author,
year
Quality domain Total
Selection
(Max score=5)
Comparability
(Max=2)
Outcome
(Max=3)
1)
Representative
ness of the
sample:
a) Truly
representative
of the average
in the target
population*
(all subjects or
random
sampling)
b) Somewhat
representative
of the average
in the target
population*
(non-random

sampling)
c) Selected
group of users.
d) No
description of
the sampling
strategy.
2) Sample
size:
a) Justified
and
satisfactory*
b) Not
justified.
3) Non-respondents:
a) Comparability
between respondents
and non-respondents
characteristics is
established, and the
response rate is
satisfactory*
b) The response rate
is unsatisfactory, or
the comparability
between respondents
and non-respondents
is unsatisfactory.
c) No description
of the response rate
or the characteristics
of the responders
and the nonresponders.
4) Ascertainment
of the exposure
(risk factor):
a) Validated tool.
**
b) Non-validated
measurement tool,
but the tool is
available or
described.*
c) No description
of measurement
tool.
1) The subjects
in different
outcome groups
are comparable,
based on the
study design or
analysis.
Confounding
factors are
controlled.
a) The study
controls for the
most important
factor (select
one)*
b) The study
control for any
additional
factor*
c) no control
1) Assessment
of outcome
a) Independent
blind
assessment **
b) Record
linkage**
c) Self report *
d) No
description.
2) Statistical
test:
a) is clearly
described,
appropriate,
and
measurement
of association
is presented,
including
confidence
intervals &
probability
level (p
value)*
b) is not
appropriate
EDHS, 2011 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) b (+1) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 7
EDHS, 2005 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) b (+1) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 7
EDHS, 2000 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) b (+1) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 7
Agumasie, 20 13 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Berhane, 2017 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Negussie, 2010 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 7
Assefa, 2008 b (+1) b(+1) c(+0) c(+0) c(+0) c (+1) b(+0) 3
Ellsberg, 2005 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Ruman, 2013 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Bedilu, 2016 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) c(+0) c (+1) b(+0) 4
Mulunesh , 2015 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) c(+0) c (+1) b(+0) 4
Tsegahun, 20 08 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Haji, 2004 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 6
Yegomawor k, 2004 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c (+1) a(+1) 7
Bereket, 2016 b (+1) b(+1) a (+1) c(+0) c(+0) c (+1) b(+0) 4
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure