Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;34(14):2418–2424. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty064

Table 2.

Power from four multiple comparison procedures MCPB, MCPP, MCPS and MCPSMV

Continuous outcome
Binary outcome
m00 m10 m01 m11 MCPB MCPP MCPS MCPSMV MCPB MCPP MCPS MCPSMV
100 0 0 10 0.54 0.68 0.72 0.81 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.58
85 15 0 10 0.54 0.61 0.68 0.80 0.28 0.37 0.40 0.49
60 40 0 10 0.55 0.54 0.64 0.79 0.28 0.30 0.34 0.43
85 0 15 10 0.54 0.58 0.68 0.77 0.28 0.42 0.44 0.65
70 15 15 10 0.54 0.54 0.64 0.77 0.25 0.33 0.36 0.66
45 40 15 10 0.55 0.50 0.60 0.76 0.29 0.30 0.33 0.66
1000 0 0 10 0.28 0.69 0.61 0.77 0.11 0.47 0.34 0.44
985 15 0 10 0.28 0.60 0.58 0.74 0.10 0.37 0.31 0.41
690 310 0 10 0.27 0.33 0.45 0.66 0.10 0.15 0.18 0.23
985 0 15 10 0.27 0.57 0.57 0.77 0.11 0.43 0.35 0.65
970 15 15 10 0.26 0.53 0.54 0.75 0.11 0.36 0.32 0.63
675 310 15 10 0.27 0.33 0.44 0.76 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.42

Note: The first four columns show the number (m00) of biomarkers associated with neither exposure nor outcome, the number (m10) associated with only the exposure, the number (m01) associated with only the outcome and the number (m11) associated with both exposure and outcome. The remaining columns show the power, defined to be the mean proportion of true mediators identified, when α=0.05. Details of the simulation can be found in Section 2.