Table 2.

Tailored selection for meta-analysis of Centor’s criteria according to method used

Study	All	Wilson	Wilson Bonferroni	Clopper Pearson	Clopper Pearson Bonferroni	Hotelling	Hotelling Continuity
Fine	Include				Include	Include	Include
Regueras	Include
Canada	Include
Treebupachatsak	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Atlas	Include					Include	Include
Dagnelie	Include
Hall et al	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Scwartz et al	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Seppala et al	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
McIsaac	Include
Alper et al	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Abu-Sabaah et al	Include
Sensitivity (95% CI)	50.6% (42.8-58.4)	38.4% (30.4-47.2)	38.4% (30.4-47.2)	38.4% (30.4-47.2)	39.7% (31.5-48.6)	42.4% (35.2-49.9)	42.4% (35.2-49.9)
Specificity (95% CI)	78.5% (65.7-87.4)	92.1% (83.5-96.4)	92.1% (83.5-96.4)	92.1% (83.5-96.4)	89.5% (82.4-94.0)	88.4% (79.4-93.8)	88.4% (79.4-93.8)