Table 3.

Tailored selection for meta-analysis of the PHQ-9 tool according to method used

Study	All	Wilson	Wilson Bonferroni	Clopper-Pearson	Clopper- Pearson Bonferroni	Hotelling	Hotelling Continuity
Arroll	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Ayalon	Include
Azah	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Cheng	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Zuithoff	Include
Gilbody	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Lotrakul	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Inagaki	Include
Liu	Include				Include	Include	Include
Sherina	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include	Include
Sensitivity (95% CI)	74.2% (63.2-82.8)	78.8% (69.7-85.7)	78.8% (69.7-85.7)	78.8% (69.7-85.7)	79.7% (71.6-86.0)	79.7% (71.6-86.0)	79.7% (71.6-86.0)
Specificity (95% CI)	91.5% (86.5-94.8)	86.3% (81.4-90.1)	86.3% (81.4-90.1)	86.3% (81.4-90.1)	87.9% (83.1-91.5)	87.9% (83.1-91.5)	87.9% (83.1-91.5)