Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;39:358–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.020

Table 3.

Association between endemic Burkitt lymphoma and IgG reactivity to P falciparum malaria antigens successfully tested in Ghana.

PfEMP group Domain class Binding phenotype PfEMP1 assay Ghana
Controls (%) Cases (%) OR (95% CI)a Adjusted OR (95% CI)b
A CIDRαCIDRα1·1 EPCR PfEMP1_IT4var06
Q1 24% 41% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 25% 0·60 (0·32–1·12) 0·80 (0·3–2·18)
Q3 25% 18% 0·44 (0·23–0·85) 0·76 (0·22–2·62)
Q4 26% 17% 0·37 (0·19–0·72) 0·41 (0·1–1·72)
X2trend (P-value) · · 0·001 0·232
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·013 0·569
A CIDRαCIDRα1·1 EPCR PfEMP1_raj116_var8
Q1 24% 40% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 27% 0·65 (0·35–1·22) 1·13 (0·4–3·17)
Q3 25% 17% 0·39 (0·20–0·77) 0·86 (0·23–3·22)
Q4 26% 16% 0·37 (0·19–0·73) 0·9 (0·18–4·4)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·001 0·832
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·008 0·956
A CIDRαCIDRα1·8a EPCR PfEMP1_GA026
Q1 24% 37% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 28% 0·67 (0·36–1·26) 1·1 (0·44–2·73)
Q3 25% 17% 0·45 (0·23–0·89) 1·6 (0·48–5·36)
Q4 26% 18% 0·46 (0·24–0·9) 2·14 (0·53–8·71)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·009 0·276
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·055 0·717
A CIDRαCIDRα1·6b EPCR PfEMP1_GA019
Q1 24% 46% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 20% 0·41 (0·22–0·79) 0·8 (0·28–2·28)
Q3 25% 19% 0·41 (0·22–0·79) 0·69 (0·22–2·17)
Q4 26% 15% 0·29 (0·15–0·57) 0·55 (0·14–2·08)
X2trend (P-value) · · 0·000 0·373
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·001 0·848
A CIDRαCIDRα1·5 EPCR PfEMP1_1965–2
Q1 24% 45% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 23% 0·48 (0·25–0·91) 0·57 (0·22–1·46)
Q3 25% 14% 0·27 (0·13–0·55) 0·42 (0·14–1·26)
Q4 26% 17% 0·33 (0·17–0·66) 0·66 (0·2–2·18)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·000 0·495
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·001 0·410
A CIDRδ Unknown PfEMP1_HB3var05
Q1 24% 43% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 20% 0·42 (0·22–0·8) 0·46 (0·18–1·17)
Q3 25% 24% 0·48 (0·25–0·91) 0·63 (0·22–1·84)
Q4 26% 13% 0·24 (0·11–0·49) 0·22 (0·06–0·73)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·000 0·035
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·001 0·047
A CIDRδ Unknown PfEMP1_IT4var02
Q1 24% 40% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 25% 0·60 (0·32–1·12) 1·09 (0·4–2·96)
Q3 25% 21% 0·49 (0·26–0·94) 0·86 (0·29–2·58)
Q4 26% 14% 0·31 (0·16–0·62) 0·85 (0·23–3·13)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·001 0·687
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·007 0·951
B CIDRα2·2 CD36 PfEMP1_IT4var24
Q1 24% 37% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 20% 0·51 (0·26–0·98) 0·52 (0·19–1·41)
Q3 25% 29% 0·83 (0·45–1·55) 2·76 (0·8–9·52)
Q4 26% 15% 0·38 (0·19–0·75) 1·04 (0·23–4·8)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·029 0·455
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·019 0·006
B CIDRα3·3 CD36 PfEMP1_IT4var26
Q1 24% 40% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 27% 0·64 (0·35–1·2) 1·44 (0·53–3·95)
Q3 25% 14% 0·34 (0·17–0·68) 0·46 (0·15–1·46)
Q4 26% 19% 0·47 (0·24–0·9) 0·79 (0·24–2·58)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·006 0·328
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·013 0·137
B CIDRα2·9 PfEMP1_IT4var30
Q1 24% 39% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 27% 0·63 (0·34–1·18) 0·88 (0·32–2·37)
Q3 25% 17% 0·44 (0·23–0·87) 1·12 (0·36–3·46)
Q4 26% 16% 0·40 (0·20–0·78) 0·93 (0·27–3·22)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·003 0·976
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·025 0·958
B CIDRα2·4 CD36 PfEMP1_IT4var33
Q1 24% 43% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 26% 0·65 (0·35–1·2) 0·52 (0·18–1·45)
Q3 25% 14% 0·35 (0·17–0·69) 0·25 (0·07–0·89)
Q4 26% 17% 0·41 (0·21–0·8) 0·75 (0·17–3·41)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·002 0·481
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·008 0·057
B CIDRα2·9 CD36 PfEMP1_IT4var45
Q1 24% 35% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 28% 0·79 (0·42–1·49) 1·35 (0·43–4·27)
Q3 25% 23% 0·69 (0·36–1·32) 2·4 (0·62–9·3)
Q4 26% 13% 0·38 (0·19–0·78) 1·06 (0·21–5·43)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·010 0·779
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·059 0·313
B CIDRα2·9 CD36 PfEMP1_IT4var61
Q1 24% 38% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 29% 0·75 (0·41–1·4) 0·86 (0·32–2·34)
Q3 25% 18% 0·45 (0·23–0·88) 1·07 (0·34–3·37)
Q4 26% 15% 0·43 (0·21–0·85) 0·97 (0·24–3·86)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·004 0·911
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·034 0·966
GLURP_R2
Q1 24% 23% Ref·
Q2 25% 33% 1·44 (0·75–2·76)
Q3 25% 18% 0·70 (0·34–1·43)
Q4 26% 26% 1·09 (0·56–2·13)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·677
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·211
SE36
Q1 24% 29% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 9% 0·31 (0·14–0·67) 0·30 (0·11–0·79)
Q3 25% 38% 1·43 (0·76–2·67) 2·31 (1·01–5·3)
Q4 26% 25% 0·92 (0·48–1·77) 1·77 (0·69–4·53)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·391 0·017
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·001 0·000
6NANP
Q1 24% 39% Ref· Ref·
Q2 25% 27% 0·64 (0·34–1·19) 0·92 (0·32–2·69)
Q3 25% 18% 0·44 (0·23–0·86) 0·53 (0·15–1·86)
Q4 26% 16% 0·38 (0·19–0·76) 0·59 (0·16–2·12)
X2 trend (P-value) · · 0·002 0·342
X2Heterogeneity (3df) (P-value) · · 0·022 0·658
a

Case-control associations with IgG reactivity to malaria antigens determined using logistic regression· IgG reactivity is coded as quartiles 0, 1, 2, and 3 estimated from MFI values in the country-specific controls, and the results are controlled for age group and calendar year enrollment period in Ghana (minimally adjusted models).

b

Case-control associations with IgG reactivity to malaria antigens determined using logistic regression with additional adjustment for antigens associated with eBL at a p < 0·05 based on trend or heterogeneity analysis in the minimally adjusted models.