Table 3.
Overview of feedback on the app prototype gathered through key informant interviews (N = 36) and focus groups (N = 6) in Germany, Sweden and Egypt (combined).
| Coding references per feedback type: | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) and percentage | ||||||||||||
| Themes | Positive (+) | Negative (–) | Suggestion (s) | |||||||||
| KI | FG | KI | FG | KI | FG | |||||||
| IMPACTa | ||||||||||||
| Health impact | 28 | 78% | 6 | 100% | 5 | 14% | 3 | 50% | 11 | 31% | 2 | 33% |
| Information needs | 5 | 14% | 3 | 50% | 9 | 25% | 1 | 17% | 7 | 19% | - | - |
| Other outcomes | 2 | 6% | 2 | 33% | 6 | 17 | 1 | 17% | 10 | 28% | 3 | 50% |
| PERCEIVED USEFULNESSa | ||||||||||||
| Performance speed | - | - | 2 | 33% | 9 | 25% | 5 | 83% | 8 | 22% | 3 | 50% |
| Flexibility/Customizability | 19 | 53% | 5 | 83% | 4 | 11% | 2 | 33% | 11 | 31% | 4 | 67% |
| PERCEIVED EASE OF USEa | ||||||||||||
| Learnability | 12 | 33% | 4 | 67% | 8 | 22% | 4 | 67% | 11 | 31% | - | - |
| USER EXPERIENCEb | ||||||||||||
| Perceived credibility | 8 | 22% | 3 | 50% | 4 | 11% | 1 | 17% | 3 | 8% | 1 | 17% |
| Anonymity | 9 | 25% | 4 | 67% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Motivation | 14 | 39% | 4 | 67% | 10 | 28% | 3 | 50% | 10 | 28% | 4 | 67% |
| Aesthetics | 8 | 22% | 4 | 67% | 12 | 33% | 4 | 67% | 10 | 28% | 2 | 33% |
| Cultural adaptation | 13 | 36% | 2 | 33 | 5 | 14% | 4 | 67% | 9 | 25% | 1 | 17% |
KI, key informant interviews; FG, focus groups.
a
Themes based on the Health-ITUEM (dimensions without codes are omitted).
b
Additional themes generated through inductive data analysis.