Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;9:1906. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01906

Table 4.

(A) P-values of the two-way ANOVA test for the effects of the factors “Copper contamination” and “Mycorrhizal inoculation treatment” and their interaction; (B) Macro- and micronutrient contents in roots of Touriga Nacional grapevine variety plants grafted onto 1103P rootstock inoculated or not with R. irregulare or F. mosseae.

(A) Factor Macronutrient Micronutrient
N P K Na Ca Mg Fe Cu1 Zn1 Mn
Copper contamination 0.603 0.652 0.002 0.067 0.064 < 0.0001 0.017 < 0.0001
Mycorrhizal inocualtion treatment 0.283 0.125 0.003 0.044 0.029 0.215 0.012 0.963
Interaction 0.496 0.572 0.040 0.575 0.025 0.722 0.002 0.857
(B) Soil treatment Inoculation treatment Macronutrient concentraction (g kg−1) Micronutrient concentration (mg kg−1)
N P K Na Ca Mg Fe Cu1 Zn1 Mn
Non-contaminated Non-inoculated 8.28 ± 1.179 a 2.21 ± 0.129 a 5.32 ± 0.292 b 1.81 ± 0.348 b 5.41 ± 0.531 a 1.04 ± 0.114 bc 79.36 ± 11.286 b < DL 2 < DL 2 27.87 ± 1.667 b
R. irregulare 8.30 ± 0.686 a 2.57 ± 0.072 a 6.28 ± 0.387 b 2.33 ± 0.171 ab 5.91 ± 0.325 a 0.86 ± 0.043 c 76.51 ± 1.963 b < DL 2 < DL 2 27.14 ± 1.106 b
F. mosseae 8.72 ± 0.733 a 2.41 ± 0.079 a 5.94 ± 0.263 b 2.47 ± 0.287 ab 6.94 ± 0.258 a 0.92 ± 0.053 c 125.24 ± 11.166 b < DL 2 < DL 2 28.84 ± 2.770 b
Cu-contaminated soil Non-inoculated 7.57 ± 0.858 a 2.38 ± 0.108 a 6.77 ± 0.510 b 2.23 ± 0.163 ab 6.49 ± 0.870 a 1.58 ± 0.134 a 85.49 ± 12.549 b 91.02 ± 11.402 a 26.51 ± 0.906 b 60.96 ± 7.823 a
R. irregulare 8.54 ± 0.230 a 2.50 ± 0.134 a 9.69 ± 0.804 a 2.97 ± 0.299 a 2.56 ± 0.396 b 1.47 ± 0.174 a 268.45 ± 59.287 a 134.78 ± 21.142 a 36.68 ± 3.422 a 69.50 ± 11.519 a
F. mosseae 10.59 ± 1.989 a 2.44 ± 0.118 a 6.14 ± 0.945 b 2.58 ± 0.163 ab 5.68 ± 1.332 a 1.36 ± 0.060 ab 125.55 ± 41.384 b 107.55 ± 25.479 a 30.62 ± 2.315 ab 67.31 ± 18.666 a

Data represent average values (n = 5) ± standard error.

Different small caps letters indicate significant differences among the different experimental treatments, according to Tukey b or to Dunn-Bonferroni a posteriori tests. Significant effect: p-value ≤ 0.05.

1

Data were not analyzed by a two-way ANOVA as data in the non-contaminated soil were below detection limit.

2

Data below the detection limit (DL). Not included in the statistical analysis.