. 2019 Jan 31;9:1098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37526-2

Table 3.

Pearson correlations coefficients for all subjective and objective stress measures reported by our participants or their partners.

	HCC	WHS_n,self	WHS_n,partner	WHS_occur,self	WHS_{occur,partner}	WHS_intens,self	WHS_{intens,partner}	PSS_self	PSS_partner	TICS_self	TICS_partner
HCC	0.95
WHS_n,self	0.17	0.84
WHS_n,partner	0.02	0.26	0.88
WHS_occur,self	0.27	0.91	0.34	0.84
WHS_{occur,partner}	0.08	0.25	0.94	0.39	0.88
WHS_intens,self	0.22	0.86	0.29	0.93	0.36	0.85
WHS_{intens,partner}	−0.01	0.24	0.89	0.38	0.95	0.37	0.87
PSS_self	0.11	0.38	0.28	0.52	0.40	0.52	0.45	0.89
PSS_partner	0.22	0.16	0.48	0.34	0.56	0.31	0.65	0.54	0.87
TICS_self	0.16	0.33	0.27	0.49	0.34	0.49	0.39	0.72	0.44	0.91
TICS_partner	0.04	0.16	0.42	0.28	0.53	0.26	0.60	0.42	0.70	0.43	0.91

Bold font highlights the between-informant correlations. The matrix diagonal (italic font)

lists the (mean) estimated internal consistency coefficients ω.

Note. HCC = hair cortisol concentration; WHS_n = number of reported weekly hassles; WHS_occur = mean score of weekly hassle occurrence; WHS_intens = mean score of weekly hassle intensity; PSS = sum score of the perceived stress scale; TICS = sum score of the TICS screening scale for chronic stress experience.