Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 22;39:265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.034

Table 3.

Distribution and comparison of methylation markers by sample type.

Biomarker Geometric mean (95% Confidence interval)
Ratio of geometric means(95% confidence interval); P-Valuea
Neoplastic (n = 113) Matched non-neoplastic(n = 113) Control (n = 343) Neoplastic vs. control Non-neoplasticvs. control
sFRP2 22.1 (19.7, 24.9) 14.0 (12.8, 15.4) 14.1 (13.4, 14.9) 1.57 (1.40, 1.76) 0.99 (0.89, 1.11)
(n = 105) (n = 106) (n = 303) P < 0.0001 P = 0.92
sFRP4 44.7 (42.1, 47.5) 34.4 (31.8, 37.2) 32.0 (31.0, 33.1) 1.40 (1.31, 1.49) 1.07 (1.00, 1.15)
(n = 108) (n = 109) (n = 312) P < 0.0001 P = 0.057
WIF1 21.6 (18.6, 25.2) 12.8 (11.1, 14.8) 13.9 (12.8, 15.0) 1.56 (1.33, 1.83) 0.93 (0.79, 1.08)
(n = 104) (n = 105) (n = 292) P < 0.0001 P = 0.33
APC1A 2.92 (2.37, 3.60) 2.54 (2.16, 3.00) 1.99 (1.83, 2.17) 1.47 (1.22, 1.77) 1.28 (1.07, 1.52)
(n = 102) (n = 102) (n = 297) P = 0.0001 P = 0.006
APC2 35.4 (32.1, 39.0) 22.3 (20.4, 24.4) 20.2 (18.9, 21.5) 1.76 (1.55, 1.99) 1.11 (0.98, 1.26)
(n = 111) (n = 106) (n = 322) P < 0.0001 P = 0.12
sFRP1 35.7 (30.5, 41.9) 24.1 (21.7, 26.7) 25.1 (23.2, 27.1) 1.42 (1.21, 1.67) 0.96 (0.82, 1.13)
(n = 39) (n = 29) (n = 118) P < 0.0001 P = 0.62
sFRP5 7.14 (5.75, 8.87) 4.90 (4.08, 5.90) 6.40 (5.64, 7.27) 1.12 (0.87, 1.43) 0.77 (0.60, 0.98)
(n = 102) (n = 95) (n = 275) P = 0.38 P = 0.03
MINT1 4.14 (3.32, 5.16) 3.40 (2.87, 4.04) 3.13 (2.82, 3.48) 1.32 (1.06, 1.64) 1.09 (0.89, 1.33)
(n = 73) (n = 70) (n = 200) P = 0.012 P = 0.42
RUNX3 8.73 (7.15, 10.7) 7.58 (6.37, 9.02) 7.44 (6.68, 8.29) 1.17 (0.94, 1.46) 1.02 (0.83, 1.25)
(n = 87) (n = 97) (n = 248) P = 0.15 P = 0.86
SOX7 5.70 (4.60, 7.06) 3.92 (3.41, 4.51) 5.41 (4.88, 5.99) 1.05 (0.85, 1.30) 0.73 (0.60, 0.87)
(n = 100) (n = 106) (n = 280) P = 0.63 P = 0.001
TUBB6 12.2 (10.5, 14.2) 8.04 (6.93, 9.34) 9.34 (8.52, 10.23) 1.31 (1.10, 1.56) 0.86 (0.72, 1.03)
(n = 108) (n = 95) (n = 292) P = 0.003 P = 0.11
a

Computed from a 2-sample t-test on log transformed data.