Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 11;11(1):80. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010080

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of studies included in the adjuvant therapy for curatively resected gastric cancer network meta-analysis (NMA-2).

Studies No. Regimen Node Stage 1 D2 or > LND No. (%) Descent Age, Median, (Range), y Men No. (%)
Anthracycline + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Neri 2001 [24] 69 Epi + 5-FU/Lv AF II–III 9 (13) W 62 (37–73) 50 (72.5)
68 Observation Obs II–III 10 (15) W 64 (35–74) 48 (70.6)
Krook 1991 [25] 61 Doxo + 5-FU AF I–III NR W 63 (33–77) 47 (77)
64 Observation Obs I–III NR W 62 (38–78) 51 (80)
Anthracycline + Doublet vs. Observation
Kulig 2010 [26] 141 Doxo + Eto + Cis ATr I–III 112 (79) W 61 (58–67) 100 (71)
154 Observation Obs I–III 123 (80) W 64 (61–66) 111 (72)
Di Costanzo 2008 [27] 130 Epi + Cis + 5-FU/Lv ATr I–III 71 (55) W 59 79 (61)
128 Observation Obs I–III 72 (56) W 59 78 (61)
De Vita 2007 [28] 112 Epi + Eto + 5-FU/Lv ATr I–III 0 W 63 (39–70) 66 (59)
113 Observation Obs I–III 0 W 62 (41–70) 65 (58)
Tentes 2006 [29] 20 Doxo + MMC + 5-FU ATr II–III 20 (100) W 65 (±10) * 14 (70)
20 Observation Obs II–III 20 (100) W 65 (±11) * 11 (55)
Tsavaris 1996 [30] 42 Epi + MMC + 5-FU ATr III NR W 53 (41–65) * 32 (76)
42 Observation Obs III NR W 57 (35–66) * 25 (60)
Lise 1995 [31] 155 Doxo + MMC + 5-FU ATr II–III 84 (27) W <71 years 94 (61)
159 Observation Obs II–III W <71 years 108 (68)
Coombes 1990 [32] 133 Doxo + MMC + 5-FU ATr II–III NR W 57 * 93 (70)
148 Observation Obs II–III NR W 57 * 98 (68)
Anthracycline + Etoposide + Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Bajetta 2002 [33] 135 Doxo + Eto + Cis + 5-FU/Lv AECF II–III Maj. W 57 (23–70) 81 (59)
136 Observation Obs II–III Maj. W 57 (31–70) 93 (68)
Anthracycline + Doublet vs. Fluoropyrimidine
Cascinu 2007 [34] 201 Epi + Cis + 5-FU/Lv ATr II–III 312 (79) W 58 135 (67)
196 5FU/Lv F II–III W 59 120 (61)
Lee 2004 [35] 32 Epi + Cis + 5-FU/Lv ATr III 32 (100) A 53 (31–61) 13 (41)
29 5-FU F III 29 (100) A 52 (26–66) 13 (45)
Anthracycline + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Mitomycin C + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Fluoropyrimidine
Tsujinaka 2000 [36] 61 Epi + 5-FU AF I–II 60 (98) A ≤75 years 38 (62)
62 MMC + 5-FU MF I–II 61 (98) A ≤75 years 44 (71)
62 5-FU F I–II 61 (98) A ≤75 years 44 (71)
Anthracycline + Doublet vs. Mitomycin C + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Fluoropyrimidine
Chang 2002 [37] 131 Doxo + MMC + 5-FU ATr I–III 131 (100) A 51 (26–70) 100 (76)
131 MMC + 5-FU MF I–III 131 (100) A 54 (23–74) 96 (73)
133 5-FU F I–III 133 (100) A 53 (21–75) 99 (74)
Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Bouche 2005 [38] 127 Cis + 5-FU CF II–III 70 (27) W 60 (32–82) 93 (73)
133 Observation Obs II–III W 62 (31–83) 93 (70)
Chipponi 2004 [39] 93 Cis + 5-FU/Lv CF II–III D1+D2 W 59 * 58 (62)
103 Observation Obs II–III W 63 * 71 (69)
Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Sasako 2011 [40] 529 S-1 F II–III 529 (100) A 63 (27–80) 367 (69)
530 Observation Obs II–III 530 (100) A 63 (33–80) 369 (70)
Nakajima 2007 [41] 93 UFT F II–III 93 (100) A 63 75 (70)
95 Observation Obs II–III 95 (100) A 64 77 (73)
Mitomycin C vs. Observation
Grau 1993 [42] 68 MMC M I–III NR W 56 * 44 (65)
66 Observation Obs I–III NR W 57 * 44 (67)
Mitomycin C + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Cirera 1999 [43] 76 MMC + Tgf MF I–III 76 (100) W 61 * 52 (68)
72 Observation Obs I–III 72 (100) W 61 * 42 (58)
Kim 1992 [44] 77 MMC + 5-FU MF III 77 (100) A (30–70) NR
94 Observation Obs III 94 (100) A (30–70) NR
Mitomycin C + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Mitomycin C
Grau 1998 [45] 40 MMC + Tgf MF I–III D1+D2 W 62 (36–75) 27 (68)
45 MMC M I–III W 63 (22–75) 27 (60)
Mitomycin C + Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Mitomycin C + Fluoropyrimidine
Kang 2013 [46] 431 MMC + Cis + 5DFUR MCF II–III 431 (100) A 55 (20–70) 294 (68)
424 MMC + 5DFUR MF II–III 424 (100) A 56 (29–70) 294 (69)
Mitomycin C + Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine
Shimoyama 1999 [47] 12 MMC + Cis + UFT (600 mg) MCF I–III D1+D2 A 65 (±8) 13 (77)
17 Cis + UFT CF I–III A 64 (±8) 8 (67)
Oxaliplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Observation
Noh 2014 [48] 520 Ox + Cap OxF II–III 520 (100) A 56 (±11) * 373 (72)
515 Observation Obs II–III 515 (100) A 56 (±11) * 358 (70)
Oxaliplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Fluoropyrimidine
Zhang 2011 [49] 42 Ox + 5-FU/Lv OxF II–III 42 (100) A 48 25 (60)
38 5-FU/Lv F II–III 38 (100) A 54 24 (63)
Oxaliplatin + Fluoropyrimidine Prolonged vs. Oxaliplatin + Fluoropyrimidine
Feng 2015 [50] 152 Ox + Cap (Prolonged) OxFPr II–III 152 (100) A 61 (±11) 104 (67)
155 Ox + Cap OxF II–III 155 (100) A 60 (±10) 99 (65)
Radiotherapy + Chemotherapy vs. Observation
Smalley 2012 [6] 281 RT + 5-FU/Lv RCh I–III 54 (10) W 60 (25–87) 202 (72)
275 Observation Obs I–III W 59 (23–80) 195 (71)
Radiotherapy + Chemotherapy vs. Fluoropyrimidine
Kim 2012 [51] 46 RT + 5-FU/Lv RCh III 46 (100) A 9> 60 34 (74)
44 5-FU/Lv F III 44 (100) A 14>60 25 (57)
Yu 2012 [52] 34 RT + 5-FU/Lv RCh II–III D1+D2 A NR NR
34 5-FU/Lv F II–III A NR NR
Zhu 2012 [53] 186 RT + 5-FU/Lv RCh I–III 205 (100) A 56 (38–73) 135 (73)
165 5-FU/Lv F I–III 175 (100) A 59 (42–75) 126 (76)
Radiotherapy + Chemotherapy vs. Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine
Park 2015 [54] 230 RT + Cis + Cap RCh I–III 230 (100) A 56 (28–76) 143 (62)
228 Cis + Cap CF I–III 228 (100) A 56 (22–77) 153 (67)
Kwon 2010 [55] 31 RT + Cis + Cap + 5-FU RCh III 31 (100) A 8 ≥ 60 21 (68)
30 Cis + 5-FU CF III 30 (100) A 14 ≥ 60 23 (77)
Radiotherapy + Chemotherapy vs. Taxane + Cisplatin
Bamias 2010 [56] 72 RT + Dtx + Cis/Car RCh II–III D0+D1+D2 W 63 (32–75) 48 (67)
71 Dtx + Cis/Car TC II–III W 62 (41–79) 52 (73)
Taxane + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine
Lee 2016 [57] 75 Dtx + S-1 TF III 75 (100) A NR NR
78 Cis + S-1 CF III 78 (100) A NR NR
Taxane + Irinotecan + Cisplatin + Fluoropyrimidine vs. Fluoropyrimidine or Mitomycin C
Bajetta 2014 [58] 562 Dtx + IRI + Cis + 5-FU/Lv TICF II–III 796 (72) W ≤75 years NR
538 5-FU/Lv F II–III W ≤75 years NR
Di Bartolomeo 2006 [59] 85 Dtx + IRI + Cis + 5-FU/Lv TICF II–III 66 (77) W 10 ≥ 70 60 (71)
81 MMC M II–III 62 (76) W 8 ≥ 70 55 (68)

1 Staging was done according to the 7th edition of the AJCC and according to the pathological TNM stage [23]. * Mean age was given instead of median age. Abbreviations: 5-DFUR = doxifluridine; 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; A = anthracycline; A descent = Asian; ATr = anthracycline-based triplet; Cap = capecitabine; Car = carboplatin; C = cisplatin; Cis = cisplatin; Doxo = doxorubicin; Dtx = docetaxel; E = etoposide; Epi = epirubicin; Eto = etoposide; F = fluoropyrimidine; I = irinotecan; IRI = irinotecan; LND = lymph node dissection; Lv = leucovorin; M = mitomycin C; MMC = mitomycin C; No. = number; NR = not reported; Obs = observation; Ox = oxaliplatin; OxFpr = doublet oxaliplatin with an one year treatment with a fluoropyrimidine; RT = radiotherapy; RCh = chemoradiotherapy; T = taxane; Tgf = tegafur; UFT = uracil/tegafur; W = western; y = years.