. 2019 Jan 5;11(1):96. doi: 10.3390/nu11010096

Table 2.

Adipose tissue (total, visceral and subcutaneous) weights (g) on PND28, 70 and 105.

Gestation Diet		NP			HP			P
Postweaning Diet		NP (n = 8)	DSS1 (n = 8)	DSS2 (n = 8)	NP (n = 7)	DSS1 (n = 8)	DSS2 (n = 8)	Gestation	Postweaning	Gestation × Postweaning
PND28
MRI	TAT	6.5 ± 0.4	6.5 ± 0.5	6.7 ± 0.5	6.9 ± 0.3	7.2 ± 0.3	7.0 ± 0.5	0.21	0.80	0.39
	VAT	4.5 ± 0.3	4.5 ± 0.3	4.7 ± 0.4	4.8 ± 0.3	5.1 ± 0.2	4.9 ± 0.4	0.34	0.96	0.66
	SAT	2.0 ± 0.2	2.0 ± 0.2	2.0 ± 0.2	2.1 ± 0.1	2.1 ± 0.1	2.1 ± 0.2	0.23	0.75	0.31
PND70
MRI	TAT	27.3 ± 2.5	28.3 ± 2.5	26.5 ± 2.9	33.5 ± 5.2	30.4 ± 1.9	36.7 ± 4.5	0.06	0.34	<0.10
	VAT	19.4 ± 1.9	19.0 ± 2.2	16.7 ± 1.9	23.2 ± 2.5	19.9 ± 1.7	23.7 ± 2.4	0.07	0.46	<0.10
	SAT	7.9 ± 0.7 ^a,b	9.4 ± 0.7 ^a,b	10.2 ± 1.1 ^a,b	10.3 ± 3.3 ^a	10.6 ± 0.8 ^a,b	15.0 ± 2.5 ^b	0.18	0.003 *	0.25
PND105
MRI	VAT	30.1 ± 2.5 ^a,b	29.4 ± 3.2 ^a,b	27.8 ± 2.3 ^a,b	35.0 ± 3.9 ^a,b	29.6 ± 3.1 ^a	40.8 ± 4.8 ^b	0.09	0.09	0.02 *
MRI	SAT	9.4 ± 1.1	10.9 ± 1.1	11.1 ± 1.3	14.6 ± 3.4	11.3 ± 0.6	15.6 ± 2.5	<0.10	0.32	0.70
Dissection	VAT	29.0 ± 2.3 ^a,b	28.2 ± 3.0 ^a,b	26.0 ± 1.9 ^a,b	33.3 ± 4.5 ^a,b	28.5 ± 3.1 ^a	39.4 ± 4.5 ^b	0.09	0.18	0.008 *
Dissection	SAT	18.6 ± 1.6	18.4 ± 1.4	17.5 ± 1.0	20.0 ± 3.0	17.3 ± 1.6	22.2 ± 2.5	0.37	0.54	0.24

Data are means ± SEMs. Effects of diets were tested within model W (*, p < 0.05). Means that are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the post-hoc test have different letters (^a or ^b). TAT, Total Adipose Tissue; VAT, Visceral Adipose Tissue; SAT, Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; PND, Post-natal Day; NP, Normal-Protein (control); HP, High-Protein; DSS1, Dietary Self-Selection 1 (P and G/L in 2 different cups); DSS2, Dietary Self-Selection 2 (P, G and L in 3 different cups).