Skip to main content
. 2017;88(Suppl 4):90–95. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i4-S.6799

Table 1.

Clinical results of the Seno 1 group compared with the Seno 3 group

Seno 1 Seno 3
ROM 75 45
Mean QuickDASH score 19 24
Mean extension lag 16 21
Mean pain (VAS score) 2 2