Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;9:2785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02785

Table 2.

Characteristics of participants and procedures.

Sample A Sample B Sample C Subsample C
Sample size n = 727 n = 826 n = 886 n = 274
Gender 59% female; 41% male 60% female; 40% male 57% female; 43% male 58% female; 42% male
Age (M, SD, range) M = 20.56 years; SD = 5.87; range = 14–34 years M = 19.55 years; SD = 4.32; range = 14–34 years M = 19.57 years; SD = 4.94; range = 14–34 years M = 18.02 years; SD = 2.82; range = 15–32 years
Percentage of physically inactive individualsa 22% 24% 26% 23%
Data collection period 9/2015–2/2016 3/2016–8/2017 9/2016–1/2017 2/2017–6/2017
Type and sources of data collection Paper-pencil version:
45% public schools (22 classes)
15% one university ]Online version:
12% university of applied science
17% two service companies
11% public administration agency
Paper-pencil version:
48% public schools (23 classes)
31% one university Online version:
6% vocational school
9% university of applied science
7% two service companies
Paper-pencil version:
27% public schools (15 classes)
6% one university ]Online version:
12% university of applied science
60% three service companies
7% public administration agencies
Online version:
7% one university
9% two service companies

Subsample C was generated by asking 567 adolescents and young adults of Sample C to fill in the inventory a second time after 2 weeks; therefore, 278 individuals participated twice. aActivity level was assessed with the BSA-F from Fuchs et al. (2015).