Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;9:2785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02785

Table 3.

Standardized factor loadings of sample B (n = 788) using exploratory structural equation modeling.

Items Factors SMC
Contact Competition/performance Distraction/catharsis Body/appearance Health Fitness Aesthetics Risk/challenge
con1 0.78 0.70
con2 0.80 0.78
con3 0.82 0.73
con4a 0.55 0.46
con5a 0.55 0.48
comper1 0.87 0.79
comper2 0.65 0.58
comper3 0.45 0.38 0.49
discat1 0.68 0.63
discat2 0.68 0.82
discat3 0.65 0.52
discat4 0.70 0.53
bodapp1 0.87 0.75
bodapp2 0.87 0.85
bodapp3 0.65 0.20 0.66
hea1 0.81 0.80
hea2 0.75 0.70
hea3 0.59 0.44
fit1 0.67 0.57
fit2 0.76 0.73
fit3 0.71 0.75
aes1 0.91 0.87
aes2 0.77 0.60
rischa1 0.66 0.60
rischa2 0.71 0.65
rischa3 0.86 0.82

SMC, squared multiple correlations; loadings < 0.20 are not presented. aIn accordance with the studies of the BMZI for middle adulthood (Lehnert et al., 2011; Schmid et al., 2018) and older adulthood (Schmid et al., 2014), an error covariance between con4 and con5 was permitted.