Table 2. Benchmarks identified in the Malawi framework, and approach to addressing them for the Uganda controlled human infection model for Schistosoma mansoni (CHI-S).
DSMB - data and safety monitoring board.
Malawi framework benchmarks | Uganda CHI-S | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Issue of national importance,
within the research agenda |
![]() |
✓ Over half of Uganda’s population estimated to be at risk from
schistosomiasis; vaccine development research supported by Vector Control Division (VCD), Ministry of Health |
2 | Safety already demonstrated |
![]() |
✓ Safety data from Leiden trials
✓ Risk assessments to Uganda to be developed |
3 | Model
quality established by
published data |
![]() |
✓ Publication of Leiden trials expected in 2018 |
4 |
Strong scientific case, without
alternative approach |
![]() |
✓ Model has potential to fast-track selection of best vaccine candidates
accelerating development of safe, effective vaccines ✓ Available animal models may not determine correlates of protection and vaccine efficacy in humans ✓ Understanding and data needed regarding differences between endemic and non-endemic populations in response to candidate vaccines |
5 | Promotes
capacity development
in country |
![]() |
✓ CHI-S preparatory activities already providing opportunities for learning
and debate for researchers, ethicists and regulators; continuing interaction between researchers and regulators is planned ✓ Further developments to include relevant infrastructure development and technical training of Ugandan researchers |
6 |
Ethical acceptability including
issues of understanding consent |
![]() |
✓ Issues of understanding and voluntariness recognised and to be assured by
pilot work in target populations in preparation for CHI-S |
7 |
Governance structure in place
(DSMB, sponsor) |
![]() |
✓ Protocol to be developed with due attention to these requirements |