Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 22;15(1):e1007565. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007565

Fig 4. Mutagenesis analysis of SpaOL defines specific functional domains.

Fig 4

(A) Western blots analyzing SipB, SipC, and InvJ secretion in S. typhimurium strains carrying the indicated spaO mutations placed in the chromosome. Eleven out of 16 mutants do not show a phenotype in the presence of SpaOS. Asterisk symbols denote mutants that showed a secretion phenotype. (B) Western blots analysis of SipB, SptP, SipC, and InvJ secretion in S. Typhimurium mutant strains expressing the indicated conditional spaO mutants placed in the chromosome along with a mutation that abolishes the translation of SpaOS. (C) Western blots analysis of the secretion of SipB, SipC, and InvJ in S. Typhimurium strains expressing the indicated spaO mutants complemented in-trans by a wild-type copy of spaO. (D) Electron micrographs of negatively stained needle complexes isolated from wild-type or spaOL67P S. Typhimurium strains show the absence of the needle substructure in the mutant strain. (E) Central sections of the cryo-ET sub-tomogram average of the injectisome structure in wild-type and spaOL67P S. Typhimurium strains showing the absence of sorting platform in the strain expressing the mutant allele.