Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 9;97(2):569–577. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky451

Table 7.

Estimated marker associated additive and nonadditive effects for traits with overall P < 0.10 for genotype

Marker effect1 Marbling score2 Ribeye area, cm2 Adjusted fat thickness, mm Vision Yield Grade Slice shear force2, kg L* reflectance
Value ± SE Value ± SE Value ± SE Value ± SE Value ± SE Value ± SE
F94L A −25.4*** ± 3.9 6.6*** ± 0.8 −2.06*** ± 0.36 −0.57*** ± 0.07 −1.7** ± 0.7 0.78*** ± 0.21
F94L D 9.4 ± 5.6 −2.7* ± 1.2 0.61 ± 0.52 0.18 ± 0.10 0.0 ± 0.9 0.16 ± 0.30
CAPN1 A −4.7 ± 4.3 0.3 ± 0.9 −0.32 ± 0.40 0.07 ± 0.08 −0.1 ± 0.7 0.02 ± 0.24
CAPN1 D 5.8 ± 5.5 0.0 ± 1.1 0.30 ± 0.51 0.07 ± 0.10 −1.3 ± 0.9 0.16 ± 0.30
A × A 13.4 ± 20.4 −2.3 ± 4.3 0.61 ± 1.90 0.06 ± 0.37 7.3* ± 3.7 0.49 ± 1.12
A × D 9.2 ± 15.0 5.2 ± 3.1 −1.03 ± 1.40 −0.23 ± 0.27 −0.8 ± 2.5 0.80 ± 0.82
D × A 13.2 ± 14.4 −2.6 ± 3.0 −0.01 ± 1.37 0.21 ± 0.26 −0.3 ± 2.4 0.96 ± 0.79
D × D 4.1 ± 10.3 2.3 ± 2.2 1.06 ± 1.02 0.05 ± 0.19 −0.1 ± 1.7 −0.51 ± 0.56

1Epistatic effects are listed as myostatin F94L effect × µ-Calpain (CAPN1) haplotype effect. Linear contrast coefficient used to estimate additive (A), dominance (D), and epistatic (A × A, D × A, A × D, D × D) effects are shown in Table 1.

2Means and SE estimates from actual values. Significance determined from analyses of logarithms of data.

* P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.