Table A.5.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | 0.55 *** | 0.59 *** | 0.58 *** |
Depressive symptoms | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Waist circumference | <0.001 | −0.002 | −0.002 |
Lifetime substance use burden | −0.10 | −0.10 * | −0.10 * |
Sources of discrimination | −0.004 | −0.12 * | −0.09 |
Age | −0.01 | −0.05 * | −0.04 |
SES | −0.06 | 1.04 | −0.06 |
Sources of Discrimination × Age | 0.002 * | 0.001 ** | |
Sources of Discrimination × SES | 0.02 | −0.04 * | |
Age × SES | 0.01 | −0.01 | |
Sources of Discrimination × Age × SES | 0.001 |
Note. Model 2 (shown in bold above) was retained as the final regression model, and significant effects were interpreted.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001
Model 1 fit: R = .36, R2 = .13, R2adj. = 09
Model 2 fit: R = .41, R2 = .17, R2adj = .11
Model 3 fit: R = .41, R2 = .17, R2adj = .12