Table I.
Tar and nicotine concentrations in 11 CSCs
| No. | CSC | Tar (mg/cigarette) | Nicotine (mg/cigarette) | Tar (mg/ml) | Nicotine (mg/ml) | Descriptiona |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2R4F | 8.9 | 0.75 | 20 | 0.91 | 2R4F Kentucky Reference cigarette |
| 2 | LT | 10.0 | 0.8 | 20 | 1.15 | Commercial US light non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 3 | LTMAS | 21.7 | 1.6 | 20 | 1.16 | Commercial US light non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 4 | FF | 16.0 | 0.9 | 20 | 0.98 | Commercial US full-flavour non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 5 | LIP | 10.0 | 0.9 | 20 | 1.16 | Commercial US light low ignition propensity non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 6 | LVB | 10.0 | 1.0 | 20 | 0.98 | Commercial US light Virginia blend non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 7 | LCF | 12.0 | 1.0 | 20 | 1.15 | Commercial US light charcoal filtered non-menthol brand cigarette |
| 8 | BUR | 23.3 | 7.5 | 20 | 2.33 | Experimental 100% burley tobacco cigarette |
| 9 | BRI | 34.6 | 5.0 | 20 | 2.34 | Experimental 100% flue-cured tobacco cigarette |
| 10 | REC | 11.8 | 0.8 | 20 | 0.64 | Experimental 100% paper reconstituted tobacco cigarette |
| 11 | UL | 5.0 | 0.5 | 20 | 1.01 | Commercial US ultra light non-menthol brand cigarette |
a
While No. 3 of LTMAS was smoked under Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) conditions, all others were generated under ISO conditions. LT and LTMAS were generated from the same commercial US light non-menthol cigarette.