Table 4:
Comparison between analysis in CABG and Valve Surgery
CABG | Valve Surgery | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I2 | Number of studies | Number of subjects | Std. Mean Difference [IV, Random, 95% CI] | I2 | Number of studies | Number of subjects | Std. Mean Difference [IV, Random, 95% CI] | |
Age | 33 | 11 | 20,594 | 0.49 [0.39, 0.59]* | 0 | 2 | 197 | 0.73 [0.42, 1.04]* |
LA diameter | 92 | 6 | 777 | 0.39 [−0.25, 1.02] | 0 | 1 | 63 | 0.43 [−0.09, 0.96] |
Ejection Fraction | 79 | 7 | 19,452 | −0.35 [−0.60, −0.11]* | 0 | 2 | 197 | −0.28 [−0.58, 0.02] |
BMI | 0 | 4 | 18,947 | 0.00 [−0.03, 0.04] | 0 | 2 | 197 | 0.12 [−0.18, 0.42] |
(b) Pooled ORs | ||||||||
CABG | Valve Surgery | |||||||
I2 | Number of studies | Number of subjects | Odds Ratio [M-H, Random, 95% CI] | I2 | Number of studies | Number of subjects | Odds Ratio [M-H, Random, 95% CI] | |
History of HF | 45 | 4 | 31,946 | 1.57 [1.38, 1.79]* | 0 | 1 | 244 | 0.68 [0.39, 1.19] |
COPD | 50 | 9 | 33,468 | 1.29 [1.05, 1.59]* | 36 | 2 | 307 | 1.44 [0.46, 4.52] |
Hypertension | 44 | 13 | 34,421 | 1.31 [1.13, 1.52]* | 53 | 3 | 441 | 1.54 [0.74, 3.18] |
History of MI | 45 | 7 | 32,406 | 1.21 [1.07, 1.37]* | 0 | 1 | 244 | 1.33 [0.38, 4.69] |
Diabetes | 0 | 14 | 34,534 | 1.06 [1.00, 1.12]* | 61 | 3 | 441 | 1.72 [0.65, 4.54] |
β-blocker use | 50 | 12 | 15,960 | 1.01 [0.79, 1.29] | 0 | 3 | 441 | 1.88 [1.22, 2.89]* |
Male gender | 43 | 14 | 34,534 | 1.00 [0.86, 1.15] | 29 | 3 | 441 | 0.82 [0.49, 1.39] |
Dyslipidemia | 0 | 5 | 1,329 | 0.96 [0.73, 1.25] | 82 | 2 | 197 | 1.03 [0.21, 5.09] |
significant difference at the 0.05 test level
IV=inverse variance, M-H=Mantel-Haenszel, BMI=body mass index, LA=left atrial, COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, MI=myocardial infarction, HF=heart failure