Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Dev Res. 2018 Aug 2;80(1):48–67. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21453

Figure 7. Comparison of 222 nm and 254 nm UVC.

Figure 7

(A) Photograph of 222 nm Kr/Cl excimer lamp. (B) Comparison of 222 nm and 254 nm UVC for in vitro inactivation of S. aureus on an agar plate. (C) S. aureus CFU extracted from a mouse wound either immediately or 24 hours after treatment with 750 mJ/cm2 of either 222 nm or 254 nm UVC. (D) % of CPD-positive cells quantified by counting 10 random high-power (×400) fields of tissue sections removed 1 hour post exposure to 150 mJ/cm2 of either 222 nm or 254 nm UVC. From (119) no permission necessary.