Table 3.
Performance of the DL‐CAD system and double reading for characterizing different types of nodules
| Evaluation format | True positive | False positive | False negative | True negative | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DL‐CAD system | ||||||
| Solid nodule | 84 | 0 | 9 | 44 | 90.30% | 100.00% |
| Part solid nodule | 5 | 9 | 4 | 119 | 55.50% | 93.00% |
| GGN | 35 | 4 | 0 | 98 | 100.00% | 96.10% |
| Double reading | ||||||
| Solid nodule | 82 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 98.70% | 97.70% |
| Part solid nodule | 10 | 1 | 1 | 113 | 90.90% | 99.10% |
| GGN | 31 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
DL‐CAD, deep learning‐based computer‐aided diagnosis; GGN, ground‐glass nodule.