Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2

Comparison 2. Exercise versus control (number of fallers).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of fallers ‐ overall analysis 63 13518 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.81, 0.89]
2 Number of fallers ‐ subgrouped by baseline fall risk 63   Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Not selected for high risk of falling 28 6347 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.92]
2.2 Selected for high risk of falling 35 7171 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.83, 0.91]
3 Number of fallers ‐ subgrouped by age (threshold 75 years) 63   Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Age < 75 50 10346 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.79, 0.91]
3.2 Age 75+ 13 3172 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.80, 0.92]
4 Number of fallers ‐ subgrouped by personnel 62 13473 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.81, 0.89]
4.1 Health professional delivering intervention 26 3747 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.74, 0.91]
4.2 No health professional delivering intervention 36 9726 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.81, 0.92]
5 Number of fallers ‐ subgrouped by group or individual exercise 63 13518 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.81, 0.89]
5.1 Group exercise 48 9219 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.78, 0.90]
5.2 Not group exercise 16 4299 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.83, 0.93]
6 Number of fallers ‐ subgrouped by exercise type 63   Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.1 Balance and functional exercises vs control 37 8288 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.82, 0.91]
6.2 Resistance exercise vs control 2 163 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.57, 1.15]
6.3 3D exercise (Tai Chi) vs control 8 2677 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.70, 0.91]
6.4 3D exercise (dance) vs control 1 522 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.35 [0.83, 2.20]
6.5 Multiple categories of exercise vs control 17 1623 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.64, 0.96]
6.6 Walking programme vs control 2 441 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.71, 1.54]
7 Number of fallers ‐ long‐term follow‐up by exercise type 3   Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
7.1 Balance and functional exercises vs control 2 1325 Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.78, 0.94]
7.2 Multiple categories of exercise vs control 1 175 Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.74, 1.38]