Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2

Comparison 5. Exercise versus control (number of people with falls that required medical attention).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of people who experienced one or more falls that required medical attention‐ overall analysis 5 1019 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.47, 0.79]
2 Number of people who experienced one or more falls that required medical attention ‐ subgrouped by exercise type 5   Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Balance and functional exercises vs control 3 583 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.54, 1.09]
2.2 Resistance exercises vs control 1 73 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.47, 1.80]
2.3 3D exercise (Tai Chi) vs control 1 188 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.13, 0.93]
2.4 Multiple categories of exercise vs control 2 247 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.29, 0.66]
3 Number of people who experienced one or more falls that required medical attention ‐ long‐term follow‐up pooled 2 319 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.37, 0.78]