Study IDa |
Adherence was measured |
Adherence data were reported |
Measurement of adherence |
Reported adherence resultsb |
Gait, balance, and functional training |
Almeida 2013 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Arantes 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Mean (range) number of sessions attended: exercise group = 22.1 (20 to 24), control group = 10.8 (10 to 12) |
Barnett 2003 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
33.7% of participants attended > 30/37 classes |
Boongrid 2017 |
Yes |
Yes |
Repetitions, sets, duration |
56.8% exercised ≥ 120 minutes a week at 12 months |
Campbell 1997 |
Yes |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Clegg 2014 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance = 46% |
Clemson 2010 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Clemson 2012 LiFE |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
76% still exercising at 6 months |
Cornillon 2002 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Dadgari 2016 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Dangour 2011 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Adherence: 38% |
Day 2002 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (SD) number of sessions attended = 10 (3.8) of 15 sessions |
Duque 2013 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Adherence: 97% |
El‐Khoury 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Started exercise programme |
Started the programme = 84%. Attended > 1 month = 73% |
Gschwind 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Median (IQR): number of times iStoppFalls system used = 42 (57); duration = 11.7 hours (22); number of times balance exergames were performed = 24 (30); duration = 4.0 hours (6.9); number of strength exercises performed = 20 (31); duration = 7.9 hours (13.4) |
Halvarsson 2013 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (range) adherence to the training sessions, intervention group: 87% (71% to 100%) |
Halvarsson 2016 balance |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (range) attendance, intervention group: 89% (66% to 100%) |
Hamrick 2017 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at yoga classes: 92% |
Hirase 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of classes attended, foam rubber: 95.5%; stable surface: 93.3%; control: 91.2% |
Iliffe 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion attended ≥ 75% classes, group ex + OEP group: 40%. Attained ≥ 75% home exercise prescription of 90 minutes/week, OEP: 37% |
Iwamoto 2009 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance at 3‐week programme: 100% |
Karinkanta 2007 balance |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance: 59% |
Kerse 2010 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Intervention group: exercised ≥ 2 a week = 55% of participants; walked ≥ 2 a week = 59%; exercised ≥ 3 a week = 25%; walked ≥ 3 a week = 37%; programme almost daily = 20%. Control group: completed all visits = 86% of participants |
Kovacs 2013 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Mean (range) attendance (/50 sessions): 80.6% (56% to 100%) |
Lin 2007 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Liu‐Ambrose 2008 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Intervention group. Completed programme ≥ 1 a week = 68% of participants; ≥ 2 a week = 57% of participants; ≥ 3 a week = 25% of participants |
Liu‐Ambrose 2004 agility group |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance, agility training group: 87.3%; stretching group: 78.8% |
Lord 1995 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance at ≥ 60% classes: 75%. For these attendees, mean (range) number of classes attended: 60 (26 ‐ 82) |
Lord 2003 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean proportion of sessions attended: 42.3% |
Luukinen 2007 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Madureira 2007 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Proportion of participants who attended 100% of sessions: 60%. Proportion of participants who did home exercise ≥ 1 a week: 76.7%; ≥ 1 to 4 a week: 36.7%; every day: 40% |
McMurdo 1997 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (range) proportion of sessions attended: 76% (46% to 100%) |
Miko 2017 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Morgan 2004 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean proportion of the 24 scheduled sessions attended: 70%. Participants who dropped out of the study completed an average of 31.7% of the exercise sessions compared with 82.9% completed session by those who did not drop out |
Nitz 2004 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Reinsch 1992 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Robertson 2001a |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Performed exercises ≥ 2x/week = 72% of participants; ≥ 3x/week = 43% of participants. Walked ≥ 2x/week = 71% of participants |
Sakamoto 2013 |
Yes |
No |
Adherence to exercise programme |
No data |
Sales 2017 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean adherence: 79.6% |
Siegrist 2016 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of participants who attended > 10 sessions: 82%. Proportion of participants who performed home exercise programme ≥ 10x: 46% |
Smulders 2010 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of sessions completed: 92.8%. Proportion of participants who completed 100% of sessions: 53.2% |
Trombetti 2011 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at exercise programme: 78% |
Weerdesteyn 2006 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at exercise sessions: 87% |
Wolf 1996 balance |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Yang 2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Proportion of intervention participants with full adherence: 44.1%; exercised < 2x/week: 13.6% |
Strength/resistance (including power) |
Ansai 2015 resistance |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
56.5% performed ≥ 24 sessions for 16 weeks (50% intervention) |
Fiatarone 1997 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Grahn Kronhed 2009 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at scheduled sessions, exercise group: 24/30 sessions (median (range) 25 (13 ‐ 30) |
Karinkanta 2007 resistance |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance: 74% |
Latham 2003 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance, exercise intensity |
Mean adherence: 82% of prescribed sessions. Mean (SD) exercise intensity at the end of training: 51% (13%) of 1 RM; 25% of participants reached the high intensity desired by the intervention |
Liu‐Ambrose 2004 resistance |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance, agility training group: 87.3%; stretching group: 78.8% |
Vogler 2009 seated group |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of sessions completed: 70% |
Woo 2007 resistance |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
3D |
Day 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance, hours |
Mean (SD) class attendance (/96 classes offered): intervention 34.4 (SD 26.9); control 41.3 (26.1). Mean intervention dose = 25.8 hours |
Huang 2010 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Li 2005 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
‐ |
Logghe 2009 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance at ≥ 80% of lessons: 47% |
Merom 2016 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Median (IQR) attendance to sessions was 56% (IQR 26% to 77%) (approximately 45 sessions) |
Voukelatos 2007 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Wolf 2003 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (SD) attendance in the Tai Chi group: 76% (19); control group 81% (17) |
Wolf 1996Tai Chi |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Woo 2007 Tai Chi |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Wu 2010 Com‐ex |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Wu 2010 Home‐ex |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Wu 2010 Tel‐ex |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (SD) attendance in Tel‐ex group: 69% (27); Comm‐ex: 71% (27); Home‐ex: 38% (46). Mean (SD) total exercise time (hours): Tel‐ex: 30 (12); Comm‐ex: 31 (12); Home‐ex 17 (21) |
General physical activity |
Ebrahim 1997 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Resnick 2002 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
7/10 intervention participants adhered to the recommended walking programme (20 minutes 3 a week). 2/10 engaged in a regular walking programme but did not meet the recommended dose. 1 did not engage in any exercise. None of the 7 control group participants started an exercise programme during the course of the study |
Voukelatos 2015 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Exercise versus exercise |
Ballard 2004 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Barker 2016 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Proportion attended over 75% of the classes: 95% |
Davis 2011 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Helbostad 2004 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Hwang 2016 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion attended >20 sessions: Tai Chi group 78%; lower limb group 72% |
Kemmler 2010 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Kwok 2016 |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
‐ |
Kyrdalen 2014 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean(SD) attendance, OEP group: 21.9 (SD 2.7) out of the possible 24 exercise sessions; OEP home: 32.8 (2.8) out of the recommended 36 exercise sessions |
LaStayo 2017 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
In both groups, all participants completed ≥ requisite minimum 18/36 exercise classes and > 90% of participants who > 28/36 exercise classes |
Liston 2014 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Lurie 2013 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Mirelman 2016 |
No |
Yes |
‐ |
‐ |
Morone 2016 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Morrison 2018 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Proportion who completed the training or all sessions in Wii group: < 50% |
Okubo 2016 |
Yes |
Yes |
Repetitions, sets, duration |
Mean (SD) exercise, balance group: 1.4 (0.5) sets/day, for 4.6 (2.0) days/week; walking group: 45.2 (24.5) min/day of walking for 4.3 (1.7) days week |
Shigematsu 2008 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Skelton 2005 |
Yes |
Yes |
Started exercise programme |
Proportion of intervention participants who completed > 1 intervention session: 73% |
Steadman 2003 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Taylor 2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Median (IQR) attendance at exercise programme: 79% (49% to 90%) |
Verrusio 2017 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Yamada 2010 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Median (IQR) adherence: 100% (74% to 100%) for each group |
Yamada 2012 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Median (IQR) adherence in complex course group: 96% (88% to 100%); simple course group: 96% (88% to 100%) |
Yamada 2013 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Median (IQR) adherence, multitarget stepping programme: 93% (83% to 96%); walking programme: 92% (83% to 96%) |
Multiple primary exercise categories |
Ansai 2015 multicomponent* |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
34.7% performed ≥ 24 sessions for 16 weeks (50% intervention) |
Arkkukangas 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Adherent = 73, not adherent = 27. Definition of adherence unclear |
Beyer 2007c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Training compliance was on average 79% (42 ‐ 100%) |
Brown 2002c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance 84.6% (22/26 sessions), range 62% to 100% |
Buchner 1997 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Bunout 2005c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
58% attended > 50% of sessions |
Carter 2002 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Attendance: 89% |
Cerny 1998c
|
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Clemson 2012 structuredc
|
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
71% still exercising at 6 months |
Freiberger 2007c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of intervention participants participating in > 75% of sessions: 77% |
Gill 2016c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at scheduled sessions, physical activity group: 68%; median (IQR) 71% (50% to 83%) |
Haines 2009c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Number of intervention participants who adhered to exercise in week 8: ≥ 1 a week = 8/19; ≥ 2 a week = 4/19 |
Hauer 2001c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Mean adherence, intervention group: 85.4%; control group: 84.2% |
Irez 2011c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of sessions completed: 92% |
Kamide 2009* |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
Intervention participants. Completed intervention > 3 a week, 19/23 (82.6%) participants; completed intervention > 2 a wk, 21/23 (91.3%) participants |
Karinkanta 2007 resistance and balance groupsc
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance: 67% |
Kim 2014c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance; exercise sessions at home |
Intervention group. Mean (range) attendance at sessions: 75.3% (64% ‐ 86%); mean frequency of home exercise programme: 3.4 a week; mean exercise time: 24.9 minutes |
Korpelainen 2006 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Intervention group. Mean attendance at sessions: 75%; mean frequency of home exercise programme: 3 a week |
Lehtola 2000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Adherence to exercise programme |
"Active participants": 52 participants; "Passive participants": 20 |
Means 2005c
|
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Ng 2015c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance: physical training 85%, control 94% |
Park 2008 |
No |
No |
‐ |
‐ |
Rubenstein 2000 |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Exercise participants attended 84% of the exercise sessions |
Sherrington 2014c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Reps, sets, duration |
Proportion of prescribed repetitions completed in 12th month: 47% |
Suzuki 2004c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean attendance at exercise classes: 75.3% |
Uusi‐Rasi 2015c
|
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Mean (range) attendance at group training: 72.8% (0% to 97.4%); home training sessions: 66.1% (0% to 100%) |
Vogler 2009 Weight‐bearing group |
Yes |
Yes |
Attendance |
Proportion of sessions completed: 62% |