Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2

Irez 2011.

Methods Study design: RCT
Number of study arms: 2
Length of follow‐up: 3 months
Participants Setting: Turkey
Number of participants: 60
Number analysed: 60
Number lost to follow‐up: 0
Sample: community‐dwelling women
Age (years): Intervention mean 72.8 (SD 6.7), Control mean 78.0 (SD 5.7)
Sex: 100% female
Inclusion criteria: Healthy, > 65 years of age, relatively sedentary (undertaking no leisure time physical activity or < 30 minutes of physical activity a day) for at least a year
Exclusion criteria: Any significant health problem or orthopaedic problem that would keep them from fully participating in the intervention protocol or the inability to attend at least 80% of the training sessions, or both
Interventions 1. Group‐based Pilates: mat exercises, used TheraBand elastic resistance bands, Pilates or exercise balls; 60 minutes, 3 a week for 12 weeks
2. Control group: usual activity
Outcomes 1. Rate of falls
Duration of the study 12 weeks
Adherence Adherence measured as sessions completed
1. Group‐based Pilates group: completed 32/36 sessions (92% participation rate)
Notes Source of funding: Mugla University, School of Physical Education and Sports
Economic information: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Participants and personnel unblinded but impact of unblinding unknown
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Falls High risk Fall calendars were returned to the treating physiotherapist, who also conducted follow‐up phone‐calls
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Fractures Unclear risk Not applicable
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Hospital admission, medical attention and adverse events Unclear risk Not applicable
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Health related quality of life (self report) Unclear risk Not applicable
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Falls and fallers Low risk No missing fall data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Falls measured, but number of fallers not reported. Adverse events not reported.
Method of ascertaining falls (recall bias) Low risk Falls calendars, completed daily. Calendars were returned to the treating physiotherapist at the end of each month. Physiotherapists followed up non‐returns