Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 28;2019(1):CD008940. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008940.pub3

Summary of findings 6. N‐acetylcysteine compared to placebo for cannabis dependence.

N‐acetylcysteine compared to placebo for cannabis dependence
Patient or population: cannabis dependence
 Setting: outpatient
 Intervention: N‐acetylcysteine
 Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Risk with placebo Risk with N‐acetylcysteine
Participants abstinent at end of treatment Study population RR 0.89
(0.59 to 1.35)
302
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa
242 per 1000 215 per 1000
 (143 to 326)
Participants experiencing adverse effects Study population RR 0.94
(0.71 to 1.23)
418
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderateb
329 per 1000 309 per 1000
 (233 to 404)
Participants withdrawn due to adverse effects Study population RR 3.00
(0.12 to 72.15)
116
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Lowa
0 per 1000 0 per 1000
 (0 to 0)
Completion of scheduled treatment Study population RR 1.06
(0.93 to 1.21)
418
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderateb
652 per 1000 691 per 1000
 (607 to 789)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded two levels for imprecision: single study, few events.

bDowngraded one level for imprecision: very few events and small group sizes.