Papaziogas 2001.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind. Ketamine IV + ropivacaine SC vs ropivacaine SC | |
Participants | N = 55, of whom 35 participants in IV ketamine and control treatment arms | |
Interventions | Pre‐incisional bolus of ketamine 1 mg/kg IV | |
Outcomes | Pain intensity (VAS, VRS) reported at baseline, at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Analgesic consumption reported at 48 h postoperatively. Rescue analgesia. Time to first request for analgesia. AEs | |
Surgery type | Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy | |
Group numbers after end of study (treatment/control) | 18/17 | |
Age of patient population (treatment/control) | 41.3 ± 13.6 47.9 ± 16.7 |
|
Notes | Third group received saline IV and saline SC. No mention of sponsorship or funding | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation concealment method not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding process not described |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding process not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 4% was withdrawn |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Predefined outcomes reported |
Size | High risk | 18, 17 and 18 participants per treatment arm |