Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;7:e6357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6357

Table 7. Species resolution using the Best Close Match method and the tree-based method with five barcodes and their combinations.

Sequences Number Best close match (%) BI (%) NJ (%)
Correct Ambiguous Incorrect No match Threshold
ITS 132 93.2 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.45 84.2 84.2
trnK 125 36.0 61.6 2.4 0.0 0.91 15.8 15.8
matK 125 16.8 83.2 0.0 0.0 0.56 10.5 10.5
psbA 126 27.0 71.4 0.8 0.8 1.12 5.2 5.2
rbcL 125 12.0 88.0 0.0 0.0 0.63 0.0 0.0
ITS+trnK 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.53 79.0 84.2
ITS+matk 125 96.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.36 79.0 84.2
ITS+psbA 126 96.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.54 84.2 89.5
ITS+rbcL 125 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.38 89.5 89.5
trnK+matK 125 52.0 45.6 2.4 0.0 0.72 26.3 26.3
trnK+psbA 125 52.0 44.8 3.2 0.0 0.99 21.1 21.1
trnK+rbcL 125 37.6 60.8 1.6 0.0 0.77 15.8 15.8
matK+psbA 125 49.6 48.8 1.6 0.0 0.77 21.1 15.8
matK+rbcL 125 25.6 74.4 0.0 0.0 0.59 10.5 10.5
psbA+rbcL 125 30.4 68.8 0.8 0.0 0.83 10.5 5.2
ITS+matK+psbA 125 96.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.54 68.4 89.5
ITS+trnK+matK 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.54 73.7 89.5
ITS+trnK+rbcL 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.51 84.2 89.5
ITS+matK+rbcL 125 99.2 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.39 79.0 89.5
ITS+rbcL+psbA 125 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.57 79.0 94.7
ITS+trnK+psbA 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.68 79.0 89.5
trnK+matK+rbcL 125 52.0 45.6 2.4 0.0 0.69 26.3 26.3
trnK+matK+psbA 125 63.2 35.2 1.6 0.0 0.82 26.3 26.3
matK+psbA+rbcL 125 49.6 49.6 0.8 0.0 0.72 21.1 21.1
rbcL+trnK+psbA 125 55.2 41.6 3.2 0.0 0.86 15.8 21.1
ITS+matK+psbA+rbcL 125 99.2 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.57 68.4 84.2
ITS+matK+psbA+trnK 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.64 73.7 84.2
ITS+matK+rbcL+trnK 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.52 73.7 84.2
ITS+rbcL+trnK+psbA 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.66 79.0 84.2
trnK+matK+psbA+rbcL 125 63.2 35.2 1.6 0.0 0.77 26.3 26.3
ITS+trnK+matK+psbA+rbcL 125 98.4 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.64 79.0 84.2