Theoretical surprise levels from the
item frequency and
alternation frequency models (with a local integration,
ω = 6) in response to (
A) globally rare events and to (
B) violation or continuation of local patterns. The local patterns reported here correspond to diagnostic ones that are highlighted in
Figure 3. Surprise levels from the
transition probability model is presented along empirical data in
Figure 4. Both IF and AF models fail to account for some key aspects of the data. For instance, the IF model does not reproduce the modulation of MEG signals by globally rare repetitions/alternations and the violation of local pattern of alternations. Conversely, the AF model does not reproduce the modulatory effect of frequent/rare items and the violation of local pattern of repetitions.