Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 4;9:1226. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37573-9

Table 2.

The comparison of the proposed nanocomposite-based biosensor with other efforts reported in the literature.

Electrode materials Detection limit (µM) Linear range (µM) Reference
PANI/PSS/Gr 5 100–1000 45
NG 2.2 5–1300 51
CoPc–MWCNTs 1 10–2600 52
AGCE/ASOD 2 5–400 53
PdNi/C nanomaterials 0.5 10–1800 54
MWCNT/CCE 7.71 15–800 55
Pt-Au hybrid 103 103–165 56
Chitosan-graphene 50 50–1200 57
OMC/Nafion 20 40–800 58
ZnO/RM 1.4 15–240 59
MBMOR/P 12.1 20–800 60
Pd/CNFs 15 50–4000 49
PMPy/Pd-nanoclusters 1000 50–1000 61
DB71 1 1–2000 62
BPPF6/CPE 8 10–3000 63
PPF/GNS 120 400–6000 64
PdNPs-GO 20–2280 1
G-BSA 25 50–3000 65
NG/Au/PANI 640 960–4660 and 5060–9860 66
NFG/Ag/PANI 8 10–11460 This work