Table 2.
The comparison of the proposed nanocomposite-based biosensor with other efforts reported in the literature.
Electrode materials | Detection limit (µM) | Linear range (µM) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
PANI/PSS/Gr | 5 | 100–1000 | 45 |
NG | 2.2 | 5–1300 | 51 |
CoPc–MWCNTs | 1 | 10–2600 | 52 |
AGCE/ASOD | 2 | 5–400 | 53 |
PdNi/C nanomaterials | 0.5 | 10–1800 | 54 |
MWCNT/CCE | 7.71 | 15–800 | 55 |
Pt-Au hybrid | 103 | 103–165 | 56 |
Chitosan-graphene | 50 | 50–1200 | 57 |
OMC/Nafion | 20 | 40–800 | 58 |
ZnO/RM | 1.4 | 15–240 | 59 |
MBMOR/P | 12.1 | 20–800 | 60 |
Pd/CNFs | 15 | 50–4000 | 49 |
PMPy/Pd-nanoclusters | 1000 | 50–1000 | 61 |
DB71 | 1 | 1–2000 | 62 |
BPPF6/CPE | 8 | 10–3000 | 63 |
PPF/GNS | 120 | 400–6000 | 64 |
PdNPs-GO | — | 20–2280 | 1 |
G-BSA | 25 | 50–3000 | 65 |
NG/Au/PANI | 640 | 960–4660 and 5060–9860 | 66 |
NFG/Ag/PANI | 8 | 10–11460 | This work |