Table 2.

The association between MFFA and trauma exposure.

	Population N (%)	Trauma exposure odds ratio (95% CI) (unadjusted)	Trauma exposure odds ratio (95% CI) model 1	Trauma exposure odds ratio (95% CI) model 2
Neglect	464 (8.2)	1.43 (1.18–1.74) p < 0.001	1.46 (1.19–1.77) p < 0.001	1.45 (1.18–1.78) p < 0.001
Antipathy	239 (4.2)	1.45 (1.11–1.90) p = 0.006	1.55 (1.17–2.04) p = 0.002	1.61 (1.20–2.16) p = 0.001
Punishment	255 (4.3)	3.51 (2.63–4.67) p < 0.001	3.33 (2.48–4.47) p < 0.001	3.38 (2.49–4.58) p < 0.001
Separation	940 (15.6)	1.47 (1.26–1.70) p < 0.001	1.50 (1.29–1.74) p < 0.001	1.53 (1.31–1.78) p < 0.001
Any MFFA	1544 (25.7)	1.49 (1.31–1.68) p < 0.001	1.49 (1.32–1.69) p < 0.001	1.54 (1.35–1.75) p < 0.001
Number of MFFA
1	1221 (20.3)	1.36 (1.19–1.55) p < 0.001	1.36 (1.19–1.56) p < 0.001	1.40 (1.22–1.61) p < 0.001
2	247 (4.1)	1.91 (1.46–2.50) p < 0.001	1.95 (1.48–2.57) p < 0.001	2.06 (1.56–2.73) p < 0.001
3+	76 (1.3)	2.65 (1.65–4.25) p < 0.001	2.64 (1.61–4.34) p < 0.001	2.59 (1.57–4.30) p < 0.001

Model 1 age, sex, ethnicity and twin status.

Model 2 model 1 variables plus deprivation, employment, marital status, years of education and urbanicity.