Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;11:7. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00007

Table 2.

Associations between mean cortical amyloid-β load and SCD.

p-values
SCD questionnaires
SCF 0.16 (–2.73 ± 1.92) 0.16
CCI self-reported –0.10 (–10.01 ± 9.69) 0.30
CCI informant-based 0.01 (0.54 ± 10.38) 0.96
Memory question 0.72 (0.46 ± 1.12) 0.14
Worry question 1.76 (1.07 ± 2.90) 0.02
Episodic memory
RBMT stories (% recall) –0.16 (–1.09 ± 0.63) 0.09
RAVLT (% recall) –0.09 (–0.62 ± 0.67) 0.35
Memory self-awareness indexes
Self-awareness index (RMBT-based) 0.55 (4.82 ± 1.23) <0.001
     Interaction EducationBPnd –0.58 (–5.23 ± 1.61) 0.002
Self-awareness index (RAVLT-based) 0.38 (3.30 ± 1.27) 0.01
     Interaction EducationBPnd –0.42 (–3.69 ± 1.65) 0.03
Self-proxy index 0.11 (0.71 ± 0.69) 0.31

Data are presented as standardized Beta (unstandardized beta +standard error) or odd ratios (95% confidence intervals). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education and depressive symptoms. Analyses between amyloid-β load, self-proxy and self-awareness indexes were based on mean cortical amyloid-β load. Self-awareness indexes; positive associations (i.e., betas) reflect heightened self-awareness (hypernosognosia) in relation with higher amyloid-β load, whereas negative scores reflect lowered self-awareness (anosognosia).