. 2019 Jan 29;10:61. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00061

Table 3.

Effect of identity priming and social information for Low frequency (A) and High frequency (B) groups in Study 1.

	(1) Identity		(2) Average donation		(3) Extensive margin		(4) Intensive margin
	B	SE(B)	B	SE(B)	B	SE(B)	B	SE(B)
(A) Low frequency
IP	–0.194	0.126	–0.155**	0.121	–0.757*	0.814	–0.299**	0.118
SI			0.038	0.064	0.427	0.437	–0.058	0.068
IP^∗SI			0.078	0.087	0.534	0.194	0.212	0.143
Univ	0.745***	0.085	0.132***	0.029	0.774***	0.300	0.108**	0.047
Const	2.193***	0.079	–0.255	0.121	–3.517***		0.215	0.203
Obs	292		292		292		122
R²	0.225		0.105				0.101
Adj R²	0.219		0.092				0.071
Log Likelihood					–184.152
Akaike Inf. Crit.					378.304
F	41.912^∗∗		8.395^∗∗∗				3.304^∗∗
(B) High frequency
IP	0.507***		–0.027	0.065	–0.103	0.353	–0.022	0.087
SI			0.037	0.054	0.428	0.296	–0.057	0.070
IP^∗SI			0.023	0.023	0.357	0.502	–0.047	0.114
Univ	0.769***		0.138***	0.035	0.743***	0.202	0.079	0.057
Const	2.095***		–0.281*	0.143	–3.939***	0.845	0.336	0.215
Obs	303		303		303		145
R²	0.299		0.056				0.032
Adj R²	0.294		0.044				0.005
Log Likelihood					–198.261
Akaike Inf. Crit.					406.521
F	63.990^∗∗∗		4.447^∗∗∗				1.169

Linear regression (Columns 1, 2, and 4). Logit regression (Column 3). IP denotes the identity priming treatment, SI denotes the social information treatment, Univ denotes universalistic values. Standard errors reported in the SE(B) columns. ^∗ significant at 10%; ^∗∗ significant at 5%; ^∗∗∗ significant at 1%.