Table 1.
Comparison of changes in areal and volumetric BMD and in estimated bone strength over 12 months of therapy with romosozumab and teriparatide.
| Reference | Romosozumab 210 mg QM | Teriparatide 20 μg/d | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Areal BMD (DXA) | |||
| Lumbar spine | [12] | 12.3%a | 6.9% |
| Total hip | 3.9%a | 0.8% | |
| Integral volumetric BMD (QCT) | |||
| Lumbar spine | [12] | 17.7%a | 12.9% |
| Total hip | 4.1%a | 1.2% | |
| Estimated bone strength (FEA by QCT) | |||
| Lumbar spine | [13] | 27.3%a | 18.5% |
| Total hip | 3.6%a | −0.7% | |
BMD, bone mineral density; QM, once monthly; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; QCT, quantitative computed tomography; FEA, finite element analysis.
p ≤ 0.05 vs. teriparatide.