Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211735

Table 2. Correlations between human- and computer-generated ratings within conditions.

Condition Correlation [95% CI] Number of recordings
r ICC(1) Training Test
(+) (–) (+) (–)
Enhance .81 [.78, .84] .64 [.59, .68] .79 [.76, .82] .61 [.55, .66] 1,047 569
Normal .81 [.78, .84] .55 [.49, .61] .79 [.76, .82] .49 [.42, .55] 880 516
Suppress .85 [.83, .87] .44 [.38, .51] .83 [.80, .85] .35 [.28, .42] 1,040 596

Notes. (+) = positive valence ratings; (–) = negative valence ratings; r = Pearson’s correlation; ICC = Intraclass correlation coefficient. All results reported are on test sets.