Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2019 Feb 5;139(6):760–771. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038312

Table 3. Net Reclassification Improvement.

Stroke or Systemic Embolism (Number of Patients with Events)
1-year Risk of S/SEE Predicted by
CHA2DS2-VASc Model
1-year Risk of S/SEE Predicted by ABC-Stroke Model
<1% 1–2% >2%
<1% 1 1 1
1–2% 14 37 41
>2% 3 12 29
Stroke or Systemic Embolism (Number of Patients with No Events)
1-year Risk of S/SEE Predicted by
CHA2DS2-VASc Model
1-year Risk of S/SEE Predicted by ABC-Stroke Model
<1% 1–2% >2%
<1% 517 113 5
1–2% 1868 2870 1188
>2% 124 604 966
Risk Score Comparison
ABC-Stroke vs. CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Scores Percent Reclassification (n)
  Correctly Upclassified 31.9% (43)
 Incorrectly Downclassfied 20.9% (29)
 Incorrectly Upclassified 15.8% (1306)
 Correctly Downclassified 31.4% (2596)
 Net Reclassification Improvement at 3 years 25.2% (95% CI, 13.1% – 46.1%)
 
Major Bleeding (Number of Patients with Events)
1-year Risk of Major Bleeding Predicted by
HAS-BLED Model
1-year Risk of Major Bleeding Predicted by ABC-Bleeding Model
<1% 1–2% >2%
<1% 0 0 0
1–2% 1 6 3
>2% 0 32 209
Major Bleeding (Number of Patients with No Events)
1-year Risk of Major Bleeding Predicted by
HAS-BLED Model
1-year Risk of Major Bleeding Predicted by ABC-Bleeding Model
<1% 1–2% >2%
<1% 0 0 0
1–2% 287 512 147
>2% 290 1460 4268
Risk Score Comparison
ABC-Bleeding vs. HAS-BLED Risk Scores Percent Reclassification (n)
  Correctly Upclassified 1.2% (3)
  Incorrectly Downclassfied 13.1% (33)
  Incorrectly Upclassified 2.1% (147)
  Correcty Downclassified 29.2% (2037)
  Net Reclassification Improvement at 3 years 13.8% (95% CI, 8.0% – 22.8%)

CI indicates confidence interval; S/SEE, stroke or systemic embolic event.