Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
ADSORB Trial | ADSORB trial compares endovascular intervention versus best medical treatment. This is not the aim of the review |
INSTEAD Trial | INSTEAD trial investigates benefits of endovascular intervention in type B aortic dissection. This is not the aim of the review |
Liang‐Wan 2011 | A clinical comparison of two operational methods (replacing ascending aorta + reconstructing aortic arch with triple‐branched stent graft and replacing ascending aorta + replacing half aortic arch to treat the aortic dissection). This study does not reflect the aims of this review |
Shackford 2017 | Not a randomised controlled trial |