| Study | Reason for exclusion |
|---|---|
| ADSORB Trial | ADSORB trial compares endovascular intervention versus best medical treatment. This is not the aim of the review |
| INSTEAD Trial | INSTEAD trial investigates benefits of endovascular intervention in type B aortic dissection. This is not the aim of the review |
| Liang‐Wan 2011 | A clinical comparison of two operational methods (replacing ascending aorta + reconstructing aortic arch with triple‐branched stent graft and replacing ascending aorta + replacing half aortic arch to treat the aortic dissection). This study does not reflect the aims of this review |
| Shackford 2017 | Not a randomised controlled trial |
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.