Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 23;2019:3951574. doi: 10.1155/2019/3951574

Table 3.

Diagnostic performances of TE in patients with different degrees of hepatic steatosis for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis assessment.

Statistic 5% ≤HS<10% (n=33) 10%≤HS<20% (n=26) HS ≥20% (n=35)

Significant fibrosis assessment (F≥2)
AUC 0.78 (0.60, 0.90) 0.79 (0.59, 0.93) 0.93 (0.79, 0.99)
Standard error 0.083 0.092 0.041
Cut-off value 6.6 6.8 8.4
Sensitivity (%) 83.3 (58.6, 96.4) 66.7 (34.9, 90.1) 76.5 (50.1, 93.2)
Specificity (%) 66.7 (38.4, 88.2) 85.7 (57.2, 98.2) 100.0 (81.5, 100.0)
PPV (%) 75.0 (50.9, 91.3) 80.0 (44.4, 97.5) 100.0 (75.3, 100.0)
NPV (%) 76.9 (46.2, 95.0) 75.0 (47.6, 92.7) 81.8 (59.7, 94.8)
Comparison of AUCs
5% ≤HS<10% - P=0.94 P=0.11
10%≤HS<20% P=0.94 - P=0.16
HS ≥20% P=0.11 P=0.16 -
Advanced fibrosis assessment (F≥3)
AUC 0.96 (0.83, 0.99) 0.94 (0.77, 0.99) 0.95 (0.82, 0.99)
Standard error 0.037 0.054 0.039
Cut-off value 8.6 7.2 8.4
Sensitivity (%) 90.0 (55.5, 99.7) 85.7 (42.1, 99.6) 85.7 (57.2, 98.2)
Specificity (%) 95.7 (78.1, 99.9) 89.5 (66.9, 98.7) 95.2 (76.2, 99.9)
PPV (%) 90.0 (55.5, 99.7) 75.0 (34.9, 96.8) 92.3 (64.0, 99.8)
NPV (%) 95.7 (78.1, 99.9) 94.4 (72.7, 99.9) 90.9 (70.8, 98.9)
Comparison of AUCs
5% ≤HS<10% - P=0.76 P=0.85
10%≤HS<20% P=0.76 - P=0.88
HS ≥20% P=0.85 P=0.88 -
Cirrhosis assessment (F=4)
AUC 1.00 (0.89, 1.00) 0.98 (0.79, 1.00) 0.90 (0.75, 0.98)
Standard error 0.000 0.029 0.076
Cut-off value 10.7 10.0 10.9
Sensitivity (%) 100.0 (59.0, 100.0) 100.0 (15.8, 100.0) 80.0 (28.4, 99.5)
Specificity (%) 100.0 (86.8, 100.0) 95.8 (78.9, 99.9) 86.7 (69.3, 96.2)
PPV (%) 100.0 (59.0, 100.0) 66.7 (9.4, 99.2) 50.0 (15.7, 84.3)
NPV (%) 100.0 (86.8, 100.0) 100.0 (85.2, 100.0) 96.3 (81.0, 99.9)
Comparison of AUCs
5% ≤HS<10% - P=0.49 P=0.19
10%≤HS<20% P=0.49 - P=0.33
HS ≥20% P=0.19 P=0.33 -

Data in parentheses were 95% confidence interval. AUC=area under the ROC curve. HS=hepatic steatosis. PPV=positive predictive value. NPV=negative predictive value.