Table 7.

2 × 2 × 4 Agency ANOVA and 2 × 2 × 3 Communality ANOVA for self-ratings versus target group ratings.

	2 × 2 × 4 Agency ANOVA	2 × 2 × 3 Communality ANOVA
Rater Gender Main Effect	F(1,397) = 1.76, p = 0.186, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.00	F(1,397) = 17.70, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.04
Target Group Main Effect	F(1,397) = 0.03, p = 0.874, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.00	F(1,397) = 45.10, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.10
Dimensions Main Effect	F(2,962) = 33.04, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.08	F(2,785) = 11.63, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.03
Rater Gender ∗ Target Group	F(1,397) = 3.11, p = 0.079, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.01	F(1,397) = 10.51, p = 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.03
Dimensions ∗ Rater Gender	F(2,962) = 31.32, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.07	F(2,785) = 18.84, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.05
Dimensions ∗ Target Group	F(2,962) = 12.32, p < 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.03	F(2,785) = 7.51, p = 0.001, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.02
Dimensions ∗ Rater Gender ∗ Target Group	F(2,962) = 4.42, p = 0.008, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.01	F(2,785) = 0.211, p = 0.646, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.00

Results are displayed for a 2 (rater gender: male, female) × 2 (target group: self, men in general when the rater was male or women in general when the rater was female) × 4 (agency dimensions: instrumental competence, leadership competence, assertiveness, independence) ANOVA and a 2 (rater gender: male, female) × 2 (target group: self, men in general when the rater was male or women in general when the rater was female) × 3 (communality dimensions: concern for others, sociability, emotional sensitivity) ANOVA.