Skip to main content
. 2018 May 2;64(1):39–46. doi: 10.1177/0706743718772516

Table 5.

Fit Statistics for the Tested Models.

Model χ2 (df) P RMSEA (90% CI) CFI TLI
Bagby et al.,2 4 itemsa 4.482 (2) 0.132 0.046 (0.000-0.110) 0.996 0.987
Melancholia subscale, 6 items 29.779 (9) <0.001 0.068 (0.042-0.096) 0.972 0.953
Gibbons et al.,1 8 items 65.130 (20) <0.001 0.068 (0.050-0.086) 0.963 0.949
Cluster a, 6 itemsb 21.372 (9) 0.011 0.053 (0.024-0.082) 0.986 0.976
Cluster a, 4 itemsb 2.782 (2) 0.249 0.028 (0.000-0.098) 0.998 0.994

CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index. n = 494.

aThis model is a compound of the two 3-item factors reported by Bagby et al.2

bThe general depression cluster, as reflecting consensus across the reviewed studies of non-Western respondents and as reported in Table 4. The 4-item model includes only the most overlapping symptoms: mood, guilt, interests, and retardation.