Table 4.
Logistic regression analysis of the determinants of high STP and TP among pupils
| AOR | p value | 95% CI for AOR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Sweet tooth pattern (STP) | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1.12 | 0.644 | 0.70 | 1.80 |
| Female | 1 | |||
| Live with parents? | ||||
| Yes | 1.95 | 0.019 | 1.11 | 3.40 |
| No | 1 | |||
| Pocket money to school? | ||||
| Yes | 4.73 | 0.008 | 1.49 | 14.99 |
| No | 1 | |||
| Dietary diversity (food groups) | ||||
| Less than 5 | 0.76 | 0.460 | 0.37 | 1.57 |
| Above 5 | 1 | |||
| Father’s educational level | 0.803 | |||
| None | 0.85 | 0.650 | 0.42 | 1.72 |
| Primary/junior high school | 0.78 | 0.510 | 0.37 | 1.63 |
| Senior high/tertiary | 1 | |||
| Mother’s occupation | 0.972 | |||
| Agriculture/farming | 0.84 | 0.728 | 0.32 | 2.23 |
| Trader | 0.97 | 0.925 | 0.53 | 1.77 |
| Civil servant | 0.71 | 0.733 | 0.10 | 5.19 |
| Others | 1 | |||
| Father’s occupation | 0.173 | |||
| Agriculture/farming | 1.09 | 0.768 | 0.61 | 1.96 |
| Trader | 0.83 | 0.563 | 0.45 | 1.54 |
| Civil servant | 3.04 | 0.044 | 1.03 | 8.98 |
| Others | 1 | |||
| Household wealth | 0.004 | |||
| Wealthiest | 3.40 | 0.002 | 1.55 | 7.46 |
| Wealthy | 1.59 | 0.218 | 0.76 | 3.35 |
| Medium | 1.35 | 0.430 | 0.64 | 2.86 |
| Poor | 0.86 | 0.685 | 0.42 | 1.77 |
| Poorest | 1 | |||
| Traditional pattern (TP) | ||||
| Household wealth | 0.008 | |||
| Wealthiest | 3.52 | < 0.001 | 1.76 | 7.02 |
| Wealthy | 1.62 | 0.156 | 0.83 | 3.14 |
| Medium | 1.38 | 0.348 | 0.70 | 2.71 |
| Poor | 1.68 | 0.120 | 0.87 | 3.25 |
| Poorest | 1 | |||
| Dietary diversity (food groups) | ||||
| Less than 5 | 0.57 | 0.103 | 0.29 | 1.12 |
| Above 5 | 1 | |||
Predictors with p values in italics are statistically significant