Table 2.
Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | OTU | Mean abundance | Log2 fold change | SE of log2 fold change | P-value | Adjusted P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia/Shigella | – | 3194.8 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 2.19E-06 | 1.22E-04 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pasteurellales | Pasteurellaceae | Haemophilus | – | 91.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 5.39E-04 | 1.51E-02 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia/Shigella | Otu0006 | 3160.8 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 4.84E-06 | 8.90E-04 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Enterobacteriaceae_unclassified | Otu0038 | 560.9 | −7.9 | 1.9 | 2.56E-05 | 2.35E-03 |
All statistically significant results from differential abundance analysis between the control and APECED groups at genus and OTU levels. Mean abundance in the data set is based on the internally normalized count data from DESeq2. P values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple testing.