Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 6;15:83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.01.001

Table 2.

Median values of individual metrics of all-participants’ delineations across all cases; including interquartile ranges (DSC = Dice coefficient; HD = maximum Hausdorff distance; MSD = Mean Surface Distance; GTV_P = gross primary tumor volume; GTV_N = gross nodal tumor volume; CTV = clinical target volume; PTV = planning target volume; mm = millimeters; IQR = Inter-Quartile Range).

GTV_P GTV_N CTV PTV
Number of participants
Case 1 13 12 16 17
Case 2 14 9 16 16
Case 3 15 13 15 15
Case 4 16 0 16 16
DSC median (IQR) 0.87 (0.78–0.94) 0.35 (0.10–0.46) 0.80 (0.72–0.90) 0.81 (0.70–0.90)
HD median in mm (IQR) 12.6 (10.09–17.75) 68.27 (41.20–80.31) 43.73 (23.48–64.90) 34.22 (24.80–59.18)
MSD median in mm (IQR) 0.37 (0.15–0.81) 17.5 (8.5–25.45) 2.03 (0.40–4.31) 1.56 (0.64–3.98)



VOR (%)
Case 1 21.9 7.1* 14 13
Case 2 67.1 0 46.4 48.1
Case 3 41 0 23.8 28
Case 4 7.2 N/A** 4.4 9.9
*

Given the inter-observer variability in selection of included lymph node stations, this VOR was calculated based on the volumes segmented by group of participants with most harmonious approach (6 out of 12).

**

N/A: Not Applicable because this scan belongs to a patient with no nodal disease.