Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;5:2055207619826685. doi: 10.1177/2055207619826685

Table 3.

Summary table of results of included studies on weight loss.

Baseline body weight (kg)
Follow-up(months unless otherwise stated)
Follow-up body weight (change in kg)
Int
Control
Int
Control
M SD M SD M SD M SD Effect size (d)
Mouttapa et al., 2011 71.7 17.43 74.91 21.42 6 weeks ↓0.59 2.12 ↓0.29 5.02 –0.02
Tate et al., 2006 CT = 89; HT = 89 CT = 13.2; HT = 13 88.3 13.9 3, 6 3 months: CT = ↓5.3; HT = ↓6.16 months: CT = ↓4.9; HT = ↓7.3 3 months: CT = 4.2; HT = 3.9 months: CT = 5.9; HT = 6.2 3 months: ↓2.86 months: ↓2.6 3 months: 3.5; 6 months: 5.7 3 months:CT vs C = –0.19**; HT vs C = –0.26**; (no dif CT vs HT)6 months: CT vs C = –0.17; HT vs C = –.35***(HT>CT)
van Genugten et al., 2012 83.39 11.49 83.34 10.61 1 (NR); 6 ↓0.34 12.36 ↓0.6 10.81 0.02
Godino et al., 2016 76.5 12.7^ 76.5 13.2^ 6, 12, 18, 24 6 months = ↓1.1; 12 months = ↓1; 18 months = ↓0.3; 24 months = ↑0.3 NR 6 months = ↑0.3; 12 months = ↑0.3; 18 months = ↑0.4; 24 months = ↑1.1 NR 6 months: –0.11*12 months: –0.1**18 months: –0.05 24 months: –0.06
Napolitano et al., 2013 NR NR NR NR 1; 2 1 month = ↓1.72 months = ↓2.4 1 month = 1.6; 2 months = 2.5 1 month: AC = ↓0.46; C = ↑0.28; 2 months: AC = ↓0.63; C = ↓0.24 1 month:AC = 1.4; C = 1.72 months: AC = 2.4; C = 2.6 ^^1 month: T vs AC = –0.5*; T vs C = –0.79***;2 months:T vs AC = –0.71*; T vs C = –0.86*
Rothert et al., 2006 92.2 14.4 92.5 14.3 3; 6 3 months = ↓2.6; 6 months = ↓2.8 NR 3 months = ↓1.4; 6 months = ↓1.1 NR 3 months = –0.1***; 6 months = –0.12***

Note: ^raw standard deviation reported; ^^ follow-up SD used to calculate effect size; *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. CT = computer tailored; C = control; HT = human tailoring; T = tailored intervention; AC = active control; NR = not reported.