Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;57(1):22–28. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2018.1563619

Table 1.

Average escape latencies for finding the hidden platform on each trial day.

Group Dose Latency(s)
Frequency across the platform
(mg/kg) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
Saline 31.3 ± 6.5 20.8 ± 6.4 16.7 ± 6.1 10.2 ± 1.9 6.3 ± 1.0
Control 81.4 ± 7.1‡ 64.1 ± 7.8‡ 57.5 ± 7.8† 56.1 ± 7.5† 1.2 ± 0.6‡
CBZ 50 80.2 ± 6.4‡ 41.6 ± 4.4 37.4 ± 6.0 27.7 ± 6.3 3.3 ± 0.5
SXC 600 69.1 ± 5.3† 30.2 ± 4.3* 17.9 ± 5.7** 18.1 ± 5.1** 5.8 ± 0.8**
CBZ + SXC 50 + 600 71.7 ± 7.5† 34.1 ± 3.9 22.5 ± 2.3* 19.4 ± 4.0* 4.5 ± 0.9*

Results are presented as means ± SEM. †p < 0.05, ‡p < 0.01 vs. saline group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. control group (n = 6 per group).