Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e008513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008513

Table 4.

Correlations of mitral annular 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET uptake (disease activity) with imaging findings in the mitral annulus (local factors) and remote regions, as well as serum biomarker levels (remote factors)

18F-fluoride TBRmax 18F-FDG TBRmax
r p r p
Local Factors
Mitral annulus CT calcium score 0.78 <0.001 0.50 <0.001
Mitral annulus 18F-fluoride TBRmax - - 0.54 <0.001
Mitral annulus 18F-FDG TBRmax 0.54 <0.001 - -
Remote Factors
Aortic valve CT calcium score 0.24 0.017 0.15 0.218
Aortic valve 18F-fluoride TBRmax 0.19 0.053 -0.02 0.848
Aortic valve 18F-FDG TBRmax -0.02 0.895 -0.05 0.658
Coronary artery CT calcium score 0.03 0.789 0.12 0.327
Coronary artery 18F-fluoride TBRmax 0.14 0.159 0.08 0.518
Aorta CT calcium score 0.20 0.049 0.14 0.262
Aorta 18F-fluoride TBRmax 0.23 0.025 -0.02 0.884
Aorta 18F-FDG TBRmax -0.16 0.127 -0.23 0.060
Bone mineral density -0.19 0.065 -0.15 0.247
Bone 18F-fluoride TBRmax 0.02 0.861 0.01 0.989
Serum biomarkers
Calcium 0.15 0.126 0.04 0.774
Phosphate -0.02 0.828 0.14 0.260
Alkaline phosphatase 0.11 0.264 -0.02 0.887
Creatinine 0.07 0.494 -0.02 0.848
LDL cholesterol -0.03 0.746 -0.30 0.014
HDL cholesterol -0.04 0.677 -0.01 0.919
Total cholesterol -0.07 0.500 -0.24 0.050
Triglycerides -0.07 0.484 0.00 0.992
Lipoprotein(a) 0.11 0.286 0.08 0.507

Data presented in study cohort patients (n=104). In 18F-FDG analyses, patients with failed myocardial suppression were excluded (n=33).